Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2841 - 2850 of 12434 for mr.
Search results 2841 - 2850 of 12434 for mr.
State v. Margaret C.
.’” Mrs. R. v. Mr. And Mrs. B., 102 Wis.2d 118, 131, 306 N.W.2d 46, 52 (1981). The ultimate decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14792 - 2005-03-31
.’” Mrs. R. v. Mr. And Mrs. B., 102 Wis.2d 118, 131, 306 N.W.2d 46, 52 (1981). The ultimate decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14792 - 2005-03-31
State v. Edward C. Brandau
of Mr. Brandau and his attorney, I do not find on this Record that it was a substantial inducement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14796 - 2005-03-31
of Mr. Brandau and his attorney, I do not find on this Record that it was a substantial inducement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14796 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
, Fahley’s trial counsel stated, in part: “[F]rom the beginning of this case Mr. Fahley has maintained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866085 - 2024-10-23
, Fahley’s trial counsel stated, in part: “[F]rom the beginning of this case Mr. Fahley has maintained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=866085 - 2024-10-23
[PDF]
State v. Kenyatta Thigpen
home, the trial court ruled the evidence was irrelevant: It is not relevant either because why Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16038 - 2017-09-21
home, the trial court ruled the evidence was irrelevant: It is not relevant either because why Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16038 - 2017-09-21
State v. Thomas L. Gillen
but that it was a matter of law to be determined as part of imposition of sentence. Court: Well, that could be, but Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5615 - 2005-03-31
but that it was a matter of law to be determined as part of imposition of sentence. Court: Well, that could be, but Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5615 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the Record why Mr. Dyer was ineligible for” the Challenge Incarceration Program (“CIP”). (Some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91312 - 2014-09-15
on the Record why Mr. Dyer was ineligible for” the Challenge Incarceration Program (“CIP”). (Some
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91312 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Deputy Frank testified: “Somewhere between that door and the small room, Mr. Olson pulled away from me
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372687 - 2021-06-02
. Deputy Frank testified: “Somewhere between that door and the small room, Mr. Olson pulled away from me
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372687 - 2021-06-02
COURT OF APPEALS
that Whiteside had alleged in his inmate complaint, “Mr. Jaeger questioned inmate Carlos Hope on 4/9/09, on D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62851 - 2011-04-13
that Whiteside had alleged in his inmate complaint, “Mr. Jaeger questioned inmate Carlos Hope on 4/9/09, on D
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62851 - 2011-04-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
he was within 36 months of release”; thus, the “revised eligibility date … justifies modifying Mr
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669710 - 2023-06-20
he was within 36 months of release”; thus, the “revised eligibility date … justifies modifying Mr
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=669710 - 2023-06-20
[PDF]
State v. Gerald R. Fogle
the circumstances, number one, the issue of who was the aggressor, whether Mr. Fogle had the opportunity to back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19889 - 2017-09-21
the circumstances, number one, the issue of who was the aggressor, whether Mr. Fogle had the opportunity to back
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19889 - 2017-09-21