Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28411 - 28420 of 63250 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 28411 - 28420 of 63250 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
NOTICE
and maintenance at the established levels, and he offered an excuse for not having filed a motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32502 - 2014-09-15
and maintenance at the established levels, and he offered an excuse for not having filed a motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32502 - 2014-09-15
State v. James A. Tanksley
PER CURIAM. James Tanksley appeals from an order[1] denying his motion for severance and separate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16289 - 2005-03-31
PER CURIAM. James Tanksley appeals from an order[1] denying his motion for severance and separate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16289 - 2005-03-31
Toumkham Rabideau v. Milan W. Stiller
a motion to dismiss. Stiller asserts the circuit court lacks jurisdiction because Toumkham Rabideau’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25694 - 2006-07-25
a motion to dismiss. Stiller asserts the circuit court lacks jurisdiction because Toumkham Rabideau’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25694 - 2006-07-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion requesting sentence modification or resentencing. We affirm on the grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910071 - 2025-02-04
postconviction motion requesting sentence modification or resentencing. We affirm on the grounds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910071 - 2025-02-04
[PDF]
Carl H. Creedy v. Axley Brynelson
on the firm’s motion to compel discovery—to which Creedy responded with a motion to limit the scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12295 - 2017-09-21
on the firm’s motion to compel discovery—to which Creedy responded with a motion to limit the scope
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12295 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
with a prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC) of .08% or more.[3] She filed a motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34466 - 2008-11-03
with a prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC) of .08% or more.[3] She filed a motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34466 - 2008-11-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
his postconviction motion. On appeal, Hoff argues that his trial counsel rendered ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173763 - 2017-09-21
his postconviction motion. On appeal, Hoff argues that his trial counsel rendered ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173763 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his postconviction motion. His appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195275 - 2017-09-21
denying his postconviction motion. His appellate counsel has filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195275 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, pro se, appeals from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2005-06)1 motion. Brown asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35450 - 2014-09-15
, pro se, appeals from an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2005-06)1 motion. Brown asserts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35450 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and Hagedorn, JJ. ¶1 GUNDRUM, J. The State appeals the circuit court’s orders granting motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164829 - 2017-09-21
and Hagedorn, JJ. ¶1 GUNDRUM, J. The State appeals the circuit court’s orders granting motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=164829 - 2017-09-21