Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28411 - 28420 of 30059 for de.

2007 WI 24
). We review the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28210 - 2007-02-21

[PDF] WI APP 42
.” State ex rel. Lyons v. De Valk, 47 Wis. 2d 200, 205, 177 N.W.2d 106 (1970). Due process requires
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139846 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Frontsheet
to be clearly erroneous, but we review the referee's conclusions of law on a de novo basis. In re
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208492 - 2018-02-15

[PDF] WI APP 64
are questions of law that we review de novo. See Zellner v. Cedarburg Sch. Dist., 2007 WI 53, ¶16, 300 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143972 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI 46
interpretation and application are questions of law that we review de novo while benefitting from the analyses
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82102 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI 24
review the referee's conclusions of law, however, on a de novo basis. See In re Disciplinary
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28210 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
Discussion ¶12 We review summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30884 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI 50
of Wis. Stat. ch. 51. The interpretation of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82775 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 219
or prospective application is a question of law which we decide de novo. Modica v. Verhulst, 195 Wis. 2d 633
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26530 - 2014-09-15

[PDF]
de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court.” Yahnke v. Carson, 2000 WI 74, ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983919 - 2025-07-17