Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28411 - 28420 of 29823 for des.

[PDF] WI App 9
to this court that he raised before the circuit court. We review a motion for summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34966 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Susan M. Lodl v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
judgment de novo, applying the same methodology as the circuit court, benefiting from the lower courts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16351 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 163
). Statutory interpretation is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29384 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jesse Franklin
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17490 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. State v. B.S., 133 Wis. 2d 136, 138, 394 N.W.2d 750 (1986). No. 2017AP1905
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218492 - 2018-09-05

COURT OF APPEALS
, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36990 - 2009-07-06

[PDF] State v. Steven A. Harvey
de novo. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis. 2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165 (1995). Whether the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21574 - 2017-09-21

State v. Hydrite Chemical Company
as the circuit court, and our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-17, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3372 - 2005-04-24

Karie (Martin) Kammerer v. Robert A. Martin
Constitution.[8] This presents an issue of law, which we determine de novo. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8739 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Kevin Gilmore
is an issue of law which we review de novo, benefitting from the analyses of the circuit court and the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16893 - 2017-09-21