Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28411 - 28420 of 63199 for records.
Search results 28411 - 28420 of 63199 for records.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). Satcher filed a response to the no-merit report. Upon review of the record and the submissions from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90916 - 2014-09-15
). Satcher filed a response to the no-merit report. Upon review of the record and the submissions from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90916 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913864 - 2025-02-13
of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=913864 - 2025-02-13
09AP935 State v. Michael A. Woodford
month. We reverse, since the record supports the conclusion that Woodford has met the rehabilitative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40576 - 2009-09-08
month. We reverse, since the record supports the conclusion that Woodford has met the rehabilitative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40576 - 2009-09-08
CA Blank Order
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121009 - 2014-09-09
of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121009 - 2014-09-09
State v. Ryan A. Buroker
as a matter of law. If it does, the court must determine whether the evidence of record provides a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6298 - 2005-03-31
as a matter of law. If it does, the court must determine whether the evidence of record provides a reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6298 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel Zembruski
over.” However, Zembruski said nothing during the recorded conversation which indicated that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13089 - 2005-03-31
over.” However, Zembruski said nothing during the recorded conversation which indicated that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13089 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joseph Gilmore
exception in § 908.03(6m), STATS., on health care provider records. However, the basic question remained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8519 - 2017-09-19
exception in § 908.03(6m), STATS., on health care provider records. However, the basic question remained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8519 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the appellate records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054187 - 2025-12-23
of the appellate records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054187 - 2025-12-23
State v. Daniel E. Rohe
not testify at trial and the medical record they prepared was not admitted. Therefore, we affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15049 - 2005-03-31
not testify at trial and the medical record they prepared was not admitted. Therefore, we affirm. BACKGROUND
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15049 - 2005-03-31
Michael Van Ess v. Department of Natural Resources
that the agency's action depends on any finding of fact that is not supported by substantial evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9394 - 2005-03-31
that the agency's action depends on any finding of fact that is not supported by substantial evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9394 - 2005-03-31