Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28411 - 28420 of 64269 for records/1000.

State v. A. David McCormack
decision, we will affirm its discretionary decision if our independent review of the record establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8192 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Birdell A. Peterson
the original motion without reference to the record and did not discover his constitutional claim until he had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10109 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
during trial, there was a discussion on the issue of Spaulding’s criminal record, which consisted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31411 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. STAT. RULE 809.17 (2009-10).1 After reviewing those memoranda and the record, we affirm the orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66566 - 2014-09-15

Outagamie County Department of Human Services v. Ismael P.
are self-evident from the record that good cause existed to reschedule the initial hearing after the thirty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3575 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
counsel’s analysis and to independently review the entire circuit court record to determine if there are any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146395 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. A. David McCormack
decision, we will affirm its discretionary decision if our independent review of the record establishes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8192 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
and an independent review of the record, we remand the matter for modification of the judgment and the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91143 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Sophie E. Nilles v. Andrew J. Nilles
considers the facts of record and the applicable law and reaches a reasoned and reasonable determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5271 - 2017-09-19

Winnebago County v. Travis G. Lankford
703, 666 N.W.2d 38. Generally, we will not reverse a trial court’s discretionary ruling if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7557 - 2005-03-31