Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28421 - 28430 of 69399 for as he.
Search results 28421 - 28430 of 69399 for as he.
State v. Henry L. Pierce
because he knowingly and voluntarily pleaded no contest. Before accepting the plea, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9274 - 2005-03-31
because he knowingly and voluntarily pleaded no contest. Before accepting the plea, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9274 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
CURIAM. Michaiah A. Belle, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion to modify his sentence. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94909 - 2013-04-08
CURIAM. Michaiah A. Belle, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion to modify his sentence. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94909 - 2013-04-08
COURT OF APPEALS
an order denying his motion to modify his sentence as untimely. He challenges the DNA surcharge imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55888 - 2010-10-25
an order denying his motion to modify his sentence as untimely. He challenges the DNA surcharge imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55888 - 2010-10-25
[PDF]
State v. Russell D. Hobson
No. 95-2914-CR -2- (Ct. App. 1994). Hobson argues that he entered his plea on the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9855 - 2017-09-19
No. 95-2914-CR -2- (Ct. App. 1994). Hobson argues that he entered his plea on the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9855 - 2017-09-19
Ann E. Burton v. Michael S. Fish
of two years. He claims the order is invalid because he was given insufficient notice of the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4043 - 2005-03-31
of two years. He claims the order is invalid because he was given insufficient notice of the hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4043 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey R. Lofgren
’ probation. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3550 - 2017-09-19
’ probation. He also appeals an order denying his postconviction motion for resentencing. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3550 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jarrell L. Henry
guilty plea, and from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[2] He argues that Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4297 - 2005-03-31
guilty plea, and from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief.[2] He argues that Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4297 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Henry L. Pierce
Pierce accordingly. Pierce cannot succeed on a motion to withdraw his plea because he knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9274 - 2017-09-19
Pierce accordingly. Pierce cannot succeed on a motion to withdraw his plea because he knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9274 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert Wilson
to four years in prison concurrent with a California sentence. He argues that the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12920 - 2017-09-21
to four years in prison concurrent with a California sentence. He argues that the trial court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12920 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert Wilson
. He argues that the trial court should have given him eighty-nine days’ credit for pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12920 - 2005-03-31
. He argues that the trial court should have given him eighty-nine days’ credit for pretrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12920 - 2005-03-31