Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28421 - 28430 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 28421 - 28430 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4660 - 2005-03-31
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4660 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Rose Marie Hartfield
factors and exercised discretion in applying those factors to the facts of this case, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25063 - 2017-09-21
factors and exercised discretion in applying those factors to the facts of this case, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25063 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Gerald Archambault v. A-C Product Liability Trust
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 95-3266 †Petition for Review Dismissed For Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10017 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 95-3266 †Petition for Review Dismissed For Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10017 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court is willing to reopen the case upon presentation of further pleadings does not undermine finality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56221 - 2010-11-01
that the court is willing to reopen the case upon presentation of further pleadings does not undermine finality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56221 - 2010-11-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244338 - 2019-07-30
conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2017-18).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244338 - 2019-07-30
[PDF]
State v. Darin W. Baratka
2002 WI App 288 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0770
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5063 - 2017-09-19
2002 WI App 288 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-0770
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5063 - 2017-09-19
Village of Hales Corners v. Michael V. Hendricks
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6480 - 2005-03-31
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6480 - 2005-03-31
State v. Bruce Blodgett
subsequently revealed a blood-alcohol concentration of .08. Blodgett tried his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12416 - 2005-03-31
subsequently revealed a blood-alcohol concentration of .08. Blodgett tried his case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12416 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Delbert L. Manke
his request for copies of transcripts and other documents pertaining to his criminal cases under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9400 - 2017-09-19
his request for copies of transcripts and other documents pertaining to his criminal cases under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9400 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on February 20, 2014. In the second case appealed, Glinsey was charged as a repeater with being a party
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218632 - 2018-09-05
on February 20, 2014. In the second case appealed, Glinsey was charged as a repeater with being a party
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218632 - 2018-09-05