Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28431 - 28440 of 29823 for des.
Search results 28431 - 28440 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
WI App 52
review de novo. See State v. Cole, 2003 WI 112, ¶10, 264 Wis. 2d 520, 665 N.W.2d 328. A statute’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192384 - 2018-08-22
review de novo. See State v. Cole, 2003 WI 112, ¶10, 264 Wis. 2d 520, 665 N.W.2d 328. A statute’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192384 - 2018-08-22
[PDF]
State v. Jesse Franklin
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17490 - 2017-09-21
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17490 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. State v. B.S., 133 Wis. 2d 136, 138, 394 N.W.2d 750 (1986). No. 2017AP1905
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218492 - 2018-09-05
review de novo. State v. B.S., 133 Wis. 2d 136, 138, 394 N.W.2d 750 (1986). No. 2017AP1905
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218492 - 2018-09-05
COURT OF APPEALS
, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36990 - 2009-07-06
, would entitle the defendant to relief. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36990 - 2009-07-06
[PDF]
WI App 44
, which is reviewed de novo. State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. “[I]f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192213 - 2017-11-20
, which is reviewed de novo. State v. Allen, 2004 WI 106, ¶9, 274 Wis. 2d 568, 682 N.W.2d 433. “[I]f
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192213 - 2017-11-20
[PDF]
State v. Steven A. Harvey
de novo. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis. 2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165 (1995). Whether the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21574 - 2017-09-21
de novo. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis. 2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165 (1995). Whether the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21574 - 2017-09-21
State v. Hydrite Chemical Company
as the circuit court, and our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-17, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3372 - 2005-04-24
as the circuit court, and our review is de novo. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315-17, 401 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3372 - 2005-04-24
Karie (Martin) Kammerer v. Robert A. Martin
Constitution.[8] This presents an issue of law, which we determine de novo. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8739 - 2005-03-31
Constitution.[8] This presents an issue of law, which we determine de novo. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8739 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kevin Gilmore
is an issue of law which we review de novo, benefitting from the analyses of the circuit court and the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16893 - 2017-09-21
is an issue of law which we review de novo, benefitting from the analyses of the circuit court and the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16893 - 2017-09-21
Bartlett Olson v. City of Baraboo Joint Review Board
. The application of a statute to a particular set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3528 - 2005-03-31
. The application of a statute to a particular set of facts is a question of law that we review de novo. State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3528 - 2005-03-31