Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28431 - 28440 of 63537 for records.
Search results 28431 - 28440 of 63537 for records.
Michelle Benzow v. Bernard W. Hall, Jr.
). In an appeal from the grant of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19748 - 2005-09-26
). In an appeal from the grant of summary judgment, this court reviews the record de novo, applying the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19748 - 2005-09-26
COURT OF APPEALS
and Mangerson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Bruce Nelson appeals[1] his divorce judgment, arguing the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88801 - 2012-10-29
and Mangerson, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Bruce Nelson appeals[1] his divorce judgment, arguing the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88801 - 2012-10-29
WI App 154 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP3083-CR Complete Titl...
that “a circuit court satisfies its § 973.017(2)(a) obligation when the record of the sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72442 - 2011-11-28
that “a circuit court satisfies its § 973.017(2)(a) obligation when the record of the sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72442 - 2011-11-28
Lori Butteris v. Stan Christiansen
evidence only if the record reveals that, “considering all credible evidence in the light most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13990 - 2005-03-31
evidence only if the record reveals that, “considering all credible evidence in the light most favorable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13990 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Gary W. Seavert v. J. M. Remodeling & Home Repair
is not clearly erroneous. There is sufficient evidence in the record to support the trial court’s choice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21042 - 2017-09-21
is not clearly erroneous. There is sufficient evidence in the record to support the trial court’s choice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21042 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
are satisfied that the trial court’s factual findings were directly based upon testimony in the record and were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31177 - 2007-12-12
are satisfied that the trial court’s factual findings were directly based upon testimony in the record and were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31177 - 2007-12-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, as a fifth or sixth offense. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285578 - 2020-09-10
, as a fifth or sixth offense. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285578 - 2020-09-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
considering Kell’s motion hearing testimony and viewing a dashboard camera video recording from Albee’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230546 - 2018-12-11
considering Kell’s motion hearing testimony and viewing a dashboard camera video recording from Albee’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=230546 - 2018-12-11
CA Blank Order
reviewing the record and the no-merit report, we conclude there are no issues of arguable merit that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122252 - 2014-09-17
reviewing the record and the no-merit report, we conclude there are no issues of arguable merit that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122252 - 2014-09-17
State v. Martin M. Dudek
that he had the right to counsel, we see nothing in the record to indicate that Dudek acted on any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26240 - 2006-08-22
that he had the right to counsel, we see nothing in the record to indicate that Dudek acted on any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26240 - 2006-08-22