Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28441 - 28450 of 33989 for dismissal.
Search results 28441 - 28450 of 33989 for dismissal.
State v. Frank James Burt, Jr.
). In exchange for Burt’s guilty plea, another count of attempted armed robbery was dismissed, but read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15489 - 2005-03-31
). In exchange for Burt’s guilty plea, another count of attempted armed robbery was dismissed, but read
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15489 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
dispositions. As relevant here, the potential dispositions were to either dismiss the petition or terminate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45174 - 2005-03-31
dispositions. As relevant here, the potential dispositions were to either dismiss the petition or terminate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45174 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
paraphernalia charge was dismissed outright. The court found Behling guilty and imposed a $250 fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72396 - 2014-09-15
paraphernalia charge was dismissed outright. The court found Behling guilty and imposed a $250 fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72396 - 2014-09-15
State v. Christopher L. Graef
revealed a blood alcohol level of 0.196%. ¶3 Graef moved either to dismiss the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6418 - 2005-03-31
revealed a blood alcohol level of 0.196%. ¶3 Graef moved either to dismiss the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6418 - 2005-03-31
State v. Richard O. Mattingly
and impartial jury, compels a dismissal of his claim because he has not been prejudiced under the Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13569 - 2005-03-31
and impartial jury, compels a dismissal of his claim because he has not been prejudiced under the Strickland
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13569 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
in this opinion; namely, that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to dismiss based on vindictive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59520 - 2014-09-15
in this opinion; namely, that the trial court erroneously denied his motion to dismiss based on vindictive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59520 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and entered which dismissed, on the merits and with prejudice, “all other parties’ claims, counterclaims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141255 - 2017-09-21
and entered which dismissed, on the merits and with prejudice, “all other parties’ claims, counterclaims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141255 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. The remaining battery and robbery charges were dismissed and read in. In December 2006, the court sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36872 - 2009-07-20
. The remaining battery and robbery charges were dismissed and read in. In December 2006, the court sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36872 - 2009-07-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the State agreed to dismiss and read in the remaining counts. During her interview with the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108601 - 2017-09-21
, the State agreed to dismiss and read in the remaining counts. During her interview with the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108601 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Nicholas Thomas Saganski v. Board of Bar Examiners
for marijuana possession, a charge that was subsequently dismissed. Finally, his explanation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17428 - 2017-09-21
for marijuana possession, a charge that was subsequently dismissed. Finally, his explanation
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17428 - 2017-09-21