Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28441 - 28450 of 41646 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 28441 - 28450 of 41646 for jury duty/1000.
CA Blank Order
. See Missouri v. Frye, 132 S.Ct. 1399, 1408 (2012) (“[A]s a general rule, defense counsel has the duty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97501 - 2013-05-27
. See Missouri v. Frye, 132 S.Ct. 1399, 1408 (2012) (“[A]s a general rule, defense counsel has the duty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97501 - 2013-05-27
State v. Mack A. Kradenych
hearing were as follows. Officer Wanggaard was on duty on July 13, 1999, when he received a dispatch call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2713 - 2005-03-31
hearing were as follows. Officer Wanggaard was on duty on July 13, 1999, when he received a dispatch call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2713 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
an affirmative duty to supplement his responses to interrogatories. Jeffrey did not supplement his responses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55724 - 2010-10-18
an affirmative duty to supplement his responses to interrogatories. Jeffrey did not supplement his responses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55724 - 2010-10-18
State v. Mark A. Sturm
in performing their duties. State v. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 56, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996). ¶9 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6696 - 2005-03-31
in performing their duties. State v. Waldner, 206 Wis. 2d 51, 56, 556 N.W.2d 681 (1996). ¶9 Here
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6696 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Larry Farris
Larry Farris comply with the provisions of SCR 22.26 concerning the duties of an attorney whose license
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16837 - 2005-03-31
Larry Farris comply with the provisions of SCR 22.26 concerning the duties of an attorney whose license
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16837 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert Glickman
22.26 concerning the duties of a person whose license to practice law in Wisconsin has been suspended
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17123 - 2005-03-31
22.26 concerning the duties of a person whose license to practice law in Wisconsin has been suspended
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17123 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert F. Pagac
court has a duty to ensure that the judge had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4997 - 2017-09-19
court has a duty to ensure that the judge had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4997 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
906. Here, the circuit court conducted a plea colloquy that satisfied the court’s mandatory duties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244195 - 2019-07-23
906. Here, the circuit court conducted a plea colloquy that satisfied the court’s mandatory duties
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244195 - 2019-07-23
COURT OF APPEALS
) is a conclusion of law. See id. However, Wis. Stat. § 108.09(6) charges the Commission with the duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60795 - 2011-03-07
) is a conclusion of law. See id. However, Wis. Stat. § 108.09(6) charges the Commission with the duty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60795 - 2011-03-07
State v. James J. B.
, it was duty bound to also dismiss the disorderly conduct charge as well. Because the juvenile court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5659 - 2005-03-31
, it was duty bound to also dismiss the disorderly conduct charge as well. Because the juvenile court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5659 - 2005-03-31