Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28451 - 28460 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
Search results 28451 - 28460 of 83001 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 973.15(2) (1979-80) prohibits his sentences in this case from running consecutive to an earlier sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48910 - 2010-04-12
. § 973.15(2) (1979-80) prohibits his sentences in this case from running consecutive to an earlier sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48910 - 2010-04-12
[PDF]
State v. Richard J. Wooster
, we conclude that the enactment of Chapter 980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8229 - 2017-09-19
, we conclude that the enactment of Chapter 980 does not constitute a new factor in this case. B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8229 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Rose Marie Hartfield
factors and exercised discretion in applying those factors to the facts of this case, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25063 - 2017-09-21
factors and exercised discretion in applying those factors to the facts of this case, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25063 - 2017-09-21
2007 WI APP 236
2007 WI App 236 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP2388-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30520 - 2007-11-27
2007 WI App 236 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP2388-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30520 - 2007-11-27
Fred W. Schmelzle v. Ken Ade
; that is, the damage portion of this case and prove by competent evidence that the value of this property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14029 - 2005-03-31
; that is, the damage portion of this case and prove by competent evidence that the value of this property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14029 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kyle W.F.
) The county where the juvenile is present. (c) In the case of a violation of state law … the county where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16111 - 2005-03-31
) The county where the juvenile is present. (c) In the case of a violation of state law … the county where
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16111 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles Jones
juries in misdemeanor cases. He did not object to being tried by a six-person jury. In Hansford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16139 - 2005-03-31
juries in misdemeanor cases. He did not object to being tried by a six-person jury. In Hansford
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16139 - 2005-03-31
State v. Darin W. Baratka
2002 WI App 288 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0770 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5063 - 2010-12-06
2002 WI App 288 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 02-0770 Complete
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5063 - 2010-12-06
[PDF]
Robert H. Diamond, Sr. v. Barbara Ruszkiewicz
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1798 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11011 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 96-1798 Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11011 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170444 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21. We affirm the order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170444 - 2017-09-21