Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28451 - 28460 of 82962 for case codes/1000.
Search results 28451 - 28460 of 82962 for case codes/1000.
State v. Rose Marie Hartfield
in applying those factors to the facts of this case, we affirm. ¶2 Hartfield, who had a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25063 - 2006-05-08
in applying those factors to the facts of this case, we affirm. ¶2 Hartfield, who had a prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25063 - 2006-05-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
J. VanNatta, pro se, appeals a postjudgment order in this divorce case. VanNatta contends
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239046 - 2019-04-11
J. VanNatta, pro se, appeals a postjudgment order in this divorce case. VanNatta contends
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=239046 - 2019-04-11
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4658 - 2005-03-31
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4658 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony J. Rychtik
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4659 - 2005-03-31
the sentencing process was prejudiced is a question of law. Id. at 514-15. ¶11 In this case, Thomas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4659 - 2005-03-31
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Kevin O'Keefe
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10403 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10403 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles Jones
-96] states: “A jury in [] misdemeanor case[s] shall consist of 6 persons.” The legislature enacted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16139 - 2017-09-21
-96] states: “A jury in [] misdemeanor case[s] shall consist of 6 persons.” The legislature enacted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16139 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Margaret Hovey v. Allstate Insurance Company
for the action. On October 26, 1998, Hovey’s attorney did not arrive in the courtroom until after the case had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15197 - 2017-09-21
for the action. On October 26, 1998, Hovey’s attorney did not arrive in the courtroom until after the case had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15197 - 2017-09-21
State v. Pastori M. Balele
in the case are not part of the instant record, though both parties refer us generally to briefs and other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9591 - 2005-03-31
in the case are not part of the instant record, though both parties refer us generally to briefs and other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9591 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
District (the District). The circuit court reasoned that the contested case hearing between the District
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91014 - 2013-01-02
District (the District). The circuit court reasoned that the contested case hearing between the District
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91014 - 2013-01-02
State v. Jay B. Stephany
a question of law, as the facts underpinning the case are undisputed. See State v. Big John, 146 Wis.2d 741
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12787 - 2005-03-31
a question of law, as the facts underpinning the case are undisputed. See State v. Big John, 146 Wis.2d 741
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12787 - 2005-03-31