Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28451 - 28460 of 88096 for otohoaphat.vn 💥🏹 xe tai van 💥🏹 xe tai van 5 cho 💥🏹 xe tai van 2 cho 💥🏹 xe tai van srm.
Search results 28451 - 28460 of 88096 for otohoaphat.vn 💥🏹 xe tai van 💥🏹 xe tai van 5 cho 💥🏹 xe tai van 2 cho 💥🏹 xe tai van srm.
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s exercise of discretion or its denial of his new sentencing factor claim. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46255 - 2010-01-25
court’s exercise of discretion or its denial of his new sentencing factor claim. Therefore, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46255 - 2010-01-25
[PDF]
State v. Xhevat Tahiri
directed NOS. 96-3288-CR 96-3289-CR 2 that these documents be filed prior to a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11704 - 2017-09-20
directed NOS. 96-3288-CR 96-3289-CR 2 that these documents be filed prior to a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11704 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS
discussed below, we disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The two sexual assault charges at issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105542 - 2013-12-11
discussed below, we disagree and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 The two sexual assault charges at issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105542 - 2013-12-11
[PDF]
State v. Donald Minniecheske
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f). No. 01-0480-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3634 - 2017-09-19
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f). No. 01-0480-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3634 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2017-18). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256684 - 2020-03-17
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2017-18). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256684 - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
Martial Ledvina v. Scott Puksich
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(a) (2001-02). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7376 - 2017-09-20
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(a) (2001-02). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7376 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2020AP907-CR 2 ¶1 GUNDRUM, J.1 Timothy M. Argall appeals from a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304215 - 2020-11-18
. No. 2020AP907-CR 2 ¶1 GUNDRUM, J.1 Timothy M. Argall appeals from a judgment of conviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304215 - 2020-11-18
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. BAUER, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2018AP1365 2 ¶1 FITZPATRICK, J. 1 Stacie Rios appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231338 - 2018-12-28
. BAUER, Judge. Affirmed. No. 2018AP1365 2 ¶1 FITZPATRICK, J. 1 Stacie Rios appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231338 - 2018-12-28
State v. Scott T. Baskin
the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 At 12:15 a.m.[2] on August 6, 2000, City of Menomonie police officer Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4131 - 2005-03-31
the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 At 12:15 a.m.[2] on August 6, 2000, City of Menomonie police officer Paul
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4131 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael S., Jr.
and 1 This opinion is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(e) (2001-02). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7016 - 2017-09-20
and 1 This opinion is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(e) (2001-02). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7016 - 2017-09-20