Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28461 - 28470 of 64289 for records/1000.
Search results 28461 - 28470 of 64289 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
at sentencing. Id. at 5-6. After an independent review of the record and consideration of counsel’s report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28958 - 2007-06-26
at sentencing. Id. at 5-6. After an independent review of the record and consideration of counsel’s report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28958 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
97-04 Amendment of Parts of SCR 70 and 71 and 32
records of court proceedings. The court has considered the presentation at the public hearing
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1021 - 2017-09-20
records of court proceedings. The court has considered the presentation at the public hearing
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1021 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Rodger A. Dierks
the burden of "show[ing] some unreasonable or unjustified basis in the record for the sentence complained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9415 - 2017-09-19
the burden of "show[ing] some unreasonable or unjustified basis in the record for the sentence complained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9415 - 2017-09-19
State v. Priest Johnson
pro se, but insisted on discharging counsel, which the record reflects he knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26211 - 2006-08-14
pro se, but insisted on discharging counsel, which the record reflects he knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26211 - 2006-08-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2013-14). 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181209 - 2017-09-21
to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2013-14). 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181209 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for postconviction relief. 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142467 - 2017-09-21
for postconviction relief. 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142467 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Patricia A.M. v. Patricia S.
will affirm a discretionary decision if the trial court relies on facts of record, applies the proper legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3212 - 2017-09-19
will affirm a discretionary decision if the trial court relies on facts of record, applies the proper legal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3212 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michael C. Yates
. See id. at 506. “[W]hen faced with a record of historical facts which supports more than one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14976 - 2017-09-21
. See id. at 506. “[W]hen faced with a record of historical facts which supports more than one
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14976 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
record, as well as the no-merit report, response, and supplemental no-merit report, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220362 - 2018-10-01
record, as well as the no-merit report, response, and supplemental no-merit report, we agree
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220362 - 2018-10-01
[PDF]
Jeff Pettis v. John Close
during that period. We conclude that the trial court’s findings were supported by the record and its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3609 - 2017-09-19
during that period. We conclude that the trial court’s findings were supported by the record and its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3609 - 2017-09-19