Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28471 - 28480 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 28471 - 28480 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
is a member.[1] The circuit court granted the motion to dismiss,[2] reasoning that it was clearly revealed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32807 - 2008-05-27
is a member.[1] The circuit court granted the motion to dismiss,[2] reasoning that it was clearly revealed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32807 - 2008-05-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained following his arrest. In an earlier appeal, 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156584 - 2017-09-21
denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained following his arrest. In an earlier appeal, 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=156584 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
3 hearing on the motion and heard the parties’ arguments in advance of the trial date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93778 - 2014-09-15
3 hearing on the motion and heard the parties’ arguments in advance of the trial date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93778 - 2014-09-15
State v. Thomas B.
to § 941.23, Stats. Thomas contends the juvenile court erred in denying his Juvenile’s Motion to Dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12458 - 2005-03-31
to § 941.23, Stats. Thomas contends the juvenile court erred in denying his Juvenile’s Motion to Dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12458 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
A.I.M. Returnable Packaging Solutions, Inc. v. Rose Stafford
In May 2003, Rose moved to adjourn the jury trial scheduled to start June 2, 2003. The motion alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7331 - 2017-09-20
In May 2003, Rose moved to adjourn the jury trial scheduled to start June 2, 2003. The motion alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7331 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
)(b). Jessel also filed a motion requesting a hearing to determine the admissibility of Jessel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729516 - 2023-11-16
)(b). Jessel also filed a motion requesting a hearing to determine the admissibility of Jessel’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729516 - 2023-11-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion.1 His appellate counsel, Christopher D
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647838 - 2023-04-25
also appeals the order denying his postconviction motion.1 His appellate counsel, Christopher D
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647838 - 2023-04-25
State v. Joseph Gilmore
., and obstructing an officer, § 946.41(1), Stats., and from an order denying his postconviction motion. The first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8519 - 2005-03-31
., and obstructing an officer, § 946.41(1), Stats., and from an order denying his postconviction motion. The first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8519 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
Jarmon appeals from an order summarily denying his postconviction motion. The issues are whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26787 - 2014-09-15
Jarmon appeals from an order summarily denying his postconviction motion. The issues are whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26787 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Randy J. Smith
his motion to withdraw the stipulation upon which the commitment was ordered. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16267 - 2017-09-21
his motion to withdraw the stipulation upon which the commitment was ordered. He argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16267 - 2017-09-21