Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28471 - 28480 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
Search results 28471 - 28480 of 82997 for case codes/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court is willing to reopen the case upon presentation of further pleadings does not undermine finality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56221 - 2010-11-01
that the court is willing to reopen the case upon presentation of further pleadings does not undermine finality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56221 - 2010-11-01
[PDF]
NOTICE
on the solicitation to intimidate the victim’s parents. On the State’s motion, this case was joined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32441 - 2014-09-15
on the solicitation to intimidate the victim’s parents. On the State’s motion, this case was joined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32441 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Gerald Archambault v. A-C Product Liability Trust
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 95-3266 †Petition for Review Dismissed For Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10017 - 2017-09-19
PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 95-3266 †Petition for Review Dismissed For Complete Title
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10017 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of a child. The victim in that case was, like the victim in this case, a child family member. Evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261162 - 2020-05-19
of a child. The victim in that case was, like the victim in this case, a child family member. Evidence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=261162 - 2020-05-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
filed a permanency plan, and in June 2020, it filed another such plan in each of the cases. Also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745047 - 2023-12-27
filed a permanency plan, and in June 2020, it filed another such plan in each of the cases. Also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=745047 - 2023-12-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
on February 20, 2014. In the second case appealed, Glinsey was charged as a repeater with being a party
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218632 - 2018-09-05
on February 20, 2014. In the second case appealed, Glinsey was charged as a repeater with being a party
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218632 - 2018-09-05
State v. Derick D. Bostick
involving Bostick. Both incidents were strikingly similar to the facts alleged against Bostick in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10569 - 2005-03-31
involving Bostick. Both incidents were strikingly similar to the facts alleged against Bostick in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10569 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 236
2007 WI App 236 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP2388-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30520 - 2015-09-01
2007 WI App 236 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2006AP2388-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30520 - 2015-09-01
Village of Hales Corners v. Michael V. Hendricks
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6480 - 2005-03-31
SCHUDSON, J.[1] In these four consolidated cases, Michael V. Hendricks, pro se, appeals from the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6480 - 2005-03-31
Kathryn A. Pinter v. Linda Pinter
. Pursuant to this court's order dated November 2, 1995, this case was submitted to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9710 - 2005-03-31
. Pursuant to this court's order dated November 2, 1995, this case was submitted to the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9710 - 2005-03-31