Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28471 - 28480 of 29984 for de.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a matter of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶15. ¶27 In an objective bias analysis, the party asserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932652 - 2025-03-25

COURT OF APPEALS
. The constitutionality of a statute, as it applies to particular facts, is a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111955 - 2014-05-07

WI App 2 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP3137 Complete Title of ...
affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment, although on different grounds. ¶33 We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90102 - 2013-11-17

L.L.N. v. J. Gibbs Clauder
the issues de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9447 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI App 10
because, even applying a de novo standard of review, we conclude the record amply demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206765 - 2018-03-16

2006 WI APP 229
. Standard of Review ¶21 We review statutory construction de novo. Hutson v. Wisconsin Personnel Comm’n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26797 - 2006-11-20

Guy Riccitelli, M.D. v. Fredrik Broekhuizen, M.D.
review its grant of summary judgment de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis.2d 304, 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13592 - 2005-03-31

State v. David S. Leighton
to a speedy trial is a constitutional question that this court reviews de novo. See State v. Ziegenhagen, 73
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16075 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 78
of statutes as applied to undisputed facts, they present questions of law, which we review de novo. Lincoln
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32327 - 2014-09-15

State v. Shannon Buettner
subject to our de novo review. Cf. id. at 626-27, 486 N.W.2d 544-45. The trial court concluded that Mr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11825 - 2005-03-31