Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28471 - 28480 of 48368 for her.
Search results 28471 - 28480 of 48368 for her.
COURT OF APPEALS
. She had lost her $85,000 per year job due to a disability.[1] In 2013, Eisinger began receiving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105211 - 2013-12-09
. She had lost her $85,000 per year job due to a disability.[1] In 2013, Eisinger began receiving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105211 - 2013-12-09
97-04 Amendment of Parts of SCR 70 and 71 and 32
assistance as well as to assist the chief judge in carrying out his or her duties and responsibilities
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1193 - 2005-03-31
assistance as well as to assist the chief judge in carrying out his or her duties and responsibilities
/sc/rulhear/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=1193 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Singleton
before it the court reporter’s affidavit, which stated that she had reviewed her original notes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10470 - 2017-09-20
before it the court reporter’s affidavit, which stated that she had reviewed her original notes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10470 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
individual ‘in order to determine his [or her] identity or to maintain the status quo momentarily while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83070 - 2014-09-15
individual ‘in order to determine his [or her] identity or to maintain the status quo momentarily while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83070 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
defendant alleging his or her ignorance of the new rule while his or her direct appeal was pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31461 - 2008-01-14
defendant alleging his or her ignorance of the new rule while his or her direct appeal was pending
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31461 - 2008-01-14
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. DeFliger
not agree with DeFliger’s description of the witness’s testimony. Her testimony was not directed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2934 - 2017-09-19
not agree with DeFliger’s description of the witness’s testimony. Her testimony was not directed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2934 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
that his or her counsel “made errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the ‘counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56315 - 2014-09-15
that his or her counsel “made errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the ‘counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56315 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
to a person under [Wis. Stat. § 974.06] must be raised in his or her original, supplemental or amended motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47006 - 2010-02-16
to a person under [Wis. Stat. § 974.06] must be raised in his or her original, supplemental or amended motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47006 - 2010-02-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
“is a young individual, and we don’t know what may have had happen[ed]” that led to her not taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1006652 - 2025-09-09
“is a young individual, and we don’t know what may have had happen[ed]” that led to her not taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1006652 - 2025-09-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
,” Scott responded “mistake.” The court then clarified that Scott actually intended to touch her breasts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65362 - 2014-09-15
,” Scott responded “mistake.” The court then clarified that Scott actually intended to touch her breasts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65362 - 2014-09-15