Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28481 - 28490 of 30165 for de.
Search results 28481 - 28490 of 30165 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
Whether a statute is unconstitutional is “a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35626 - 2009-02-18
Whether a statute is unconstitutional is “a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35626 - 2009-02-18
State v. Steven A. Harvey
to be reviewed de novo. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis. 2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165 (1995). Whether the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21574 - 2006-02-23
to be reviewed de novo. See State v. Wills, 193 Wis. 2d 273, 277, 533 N.W.2d 165 (1995). Whether the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21574 - 2006-02-23
[PDF]
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
court can be waived is also a question of law that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16754 - 2017-09-21
court can be waived is also a question of law that we review de novo. Kywanda F., 200 Wis. 2d at 32
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16754 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
reviews de novo. Noffke ex No. 2016AP1517 9 rel. Swenson v. Bakke, 2009 WI 10, ¶9, 315
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233081 - 2019-01-18
reviews de novo. Noffke ex No. 2016AP1517 9 rel. Swenson v. Bakke, 2009 WI 10, ¶9, 315
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233081 - 2019-01-18
[PDF]
Frontsheet
Preemption presents a question of law we review de novo. Partenfelder v. Rhode, 2014 WI 80, ¶25, 356 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265793 - 2020-06-26
Preemption presents a question of law we review de novo. Partenfelder v. Rhode, 2014 WI 80, ¶25, 356 Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=265793 - 2020-06-26
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17517 - 2017-09-21
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17517 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17519 - 2017-09-21
it was prejudicial to the defendant are questions of law reviewed by this court de novo. Id.; State v. Pitsch
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17519 - 2017-09-21
State v. Gary Lewis Petty
of a statute is a question of law which this court reviews de novo, without deference to the lower courts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16870 - 2005-03-31
of a statute is a question of law which this court reviews de novo, without deference to the lower courts
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16870 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Bruce B. Jacobson
of law and they are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Norlin, 104 Wis. 2d 117
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16612 - 2005-03-31
of law and they are reviewed de novo. In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Norlin, 104 Wis. 2d 117
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16612 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Luis Cardenas-Hernandez
to present a defense was violated is a question of constitutional fact that this court reviews de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17195 - 2017-09-21
to present a defense was violated is a question of constitutional fact that this court reviews de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17195 - 2017-09-21