Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28491 - 28500 of 64150 for records.
Search results 28491 - 28500 of 64150 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ claims are procedurally barred. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650563 - 2023-05-02
’ claims are procedurally barred. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650563 - 2023-05-02
Janet A. Baker v. Larry F. Schock
in the record and on the appropriate and applicable law. Id. Maintenance may be modified only upon a showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10926 - 2005-03-31
in the record and on the appropriate and applicable law. Id. Maintenance may be modified only upon a showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10926 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465885 - 2021-12-29
elected not to do so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465885 - 2021-12-29
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Minniecheske, pro se, appeals a 1997 judgment of conviction. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91937 - 2014-09-15
Minniecheske, pro se, appeals a 1997 judgment of conviction. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91937 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141759 - 2017-09-21
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141759 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we reject the no-merit report because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192183 - 2017-09-21
consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we reject the no-merit report because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192183 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263143 - 2020-06-10
of the report and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=263143 - 2020-06-10
[PDF]
NOTICE
recording of his statement. Parker argues that, by failing to present the “best evidence” that might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30702 - 2014-09-15
recording of his statement. Parker argues that, by failing to present the “best evidence” that might
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30702 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Nos. 2023AP516-CRNM 2023AP517-CRNM 2 independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770565 - 2024-02-29
. Nos. 2023AP516-CRNM 2023AP517-CRNM 2 independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=770565 - 2024-02-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114652 - 2017-09-21
denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114652 - 2017-09-21