Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28491 - 28500 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 28491 - 28500 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Racine County Human Services v. Dadra L.
, after a jury trial, the court terminated Donald’s parental rights to his son. ¶4 At trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4912 - 2005-03-31
, after a jury trial, the court terminated Donald’s parental rights to his son. ¶4 At trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4912 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the issues in the context of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, the issues can be reframed as follows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698827 - 2023-09-06
the issues in the context of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, the issues can be reframed as follows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698827 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
Valley Bank Northeast v. Angela L. Barta
received concerning the unrelated $65,000 note; (2) the trial court should have denied Barta attorney fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9040 - 2017-09-19
received concerning the unrelated $65,000 note; (2) the trial court should have denied Barta attorney fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9040 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
represented himself at trial, was convicted by a jury of one count of first- degree intentional homicide
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968154 - 2025-06-10
represented himself at trial, was convicted by a jury of one count of first- degree intentional homicide
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968154 - 2025-06-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
supervision. Hinton filed a postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767558 - 2024-02-22
supervision. Hinton filed a postconviction motion alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=767558 - 2024-02-22
State v. Rodney Calhoun
anything wrong. The trial court set a trial date for the first case. On August 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9760 - 2005-03-31
anything wrong. The trial court set a trial date for the first case. On August 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9760 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rodney Calhoun
anything wrong. The trial court set a trial date for the first case. On August 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9761 - 2005-03-31
anything wrong. The trial court set a trial date for the first case. On August 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9761 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark J. Tilot
the judgment and remand the matter for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2 At approximately 2 a.m. on August 24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19980 - 2005-10-17
the judgment and remand the matter for a new trial. BACKGROUND ¶2 At approximately 2 a.m. on August 24
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19980 - 2005-10-17
COURT OF APPEALS
complaints were scheduled for separate trials. Three days before the scheduled trial on the first complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102416 - 2013-09-30
complaints were scheduled for separate trials. Three days before the scheduled trial on the first complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102416 - 2013-09-30
[PDF]
NOTICE
a new trial. We affirm. ¶2 We first note that Presley’s brief is deficient on its face. He does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31174 - 2014-09-15
a new trial. We affirm. ¶2 We first note that Presley’s brief is deficient on its face. He does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31174 - 2014-09-15