Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2851 - 2860 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 2851 - 2860 of 63734 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
in their custody. The trial court decided to wait to rule upon the motion until the guardianship trial had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90931 - 2012-12-26
in their custody. The trial court decided to wait to rule upon the motion until the guardianship trial had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90931 - 2012-12-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Garland’s motion for sentence credit. Garland was sent a copy of the report and has filed a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255513 - 2020-02-27
Garland’s motion for sentence credit. Garland was sent a copy of the report and has filed a response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255513 - 2020-02-27
COURT OF APPEALS
for summary judgment and the circuit court granted their motions.[3] The circuit court did not reach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44704 - 2009-12-16
for summary judgment and the circuit court granted their motions.[3] The circuit court did not reach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44704 - 2009-12-16
[PDF]
NOTICE
their motions.3 The circuit court did not reach the Kerlyluks’ underlying legal theory—that Riley and Knoop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44704 - 2014-09-15
their motions.3 The circuit court did not reach the Kerlyluks’ underlying legal theory—that Riley and Knoop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44704 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
also appeals from a postconviction order denying his motion to vacate the DNA surcharge imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160581 - 2017-09-21
also appeals from a postconviction order denying his motion to vacate the DNA surcharge imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160581 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a joint recommendation for three years’ probation, with conditions that included sex offender treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120440 - 2014-08-27
a joint recommendation for three years’ probation, with conditions that included sex offender treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120440 - 2014-08-27
State v. Brian W. Easton
erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence grounded on an alleged Miranda violation.[2] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3102 - 2005-03-31
erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence grounded on an alleged Miranda violation.[2] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3102 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Carter T. Hopson
an order denying his postconviction motion. Hopson claims: (1) the trial court should have granted his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6958 - 2017-09-20
an order denying his postconviction motion. Hopson claims: (1) the trial court should have granted his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6958 - 2017-09-20
State v. Carter T. Hopson
to Wis. Stat. § 941.29(2). He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Hopson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6958 - 2005-03-31
to Wis. Stat. § 941.29(2). He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. Hopson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6958 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ motion to suppress his statements at the hospital, finding that Bavers was not in custody when he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254922 - 2020-02-20
’ motion to suppress his statements at the hospital, finding that Bavers was not in custody when he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254922 - 2020-02-20