Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2851 - 2860 of 86661 for WA 0859 3970 0884 Tukang Buat Interior Rumah Minimalis 2 Lantai Type 70 WIlayah Sragen.

CA Blank Order
for summary disposition. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.21 (2011-12).[2] We conclude that the cumulative effect
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105341 - 2013-12-04

[PDF] State v. Susan M. Vetos
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2001-02). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5431 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
sentencing discretion. We reject Jones’ arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 An amended information
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94485 - 2014-03-11

Supreme Court of Wisconsin No. 10-03 In the matter of the petition to amend Supre...
the hourly rate of compensation for court-appointed lawyers from $70 to $80, indexing that rate
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67390 - 2011-07-05

State v. Dontrell A. Leflore
for sentence modification.[2] Leflore claims that: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective when the attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5300 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of one count of first-degree sexual assault of a child No. 2021AP926-CR 2 under age
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654260 - 2023-05-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
; reversed in part and cause remanded with directions. No. 2016AP1354 2 ¶1 SEIDL, J. 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=193169 - 2017-09-21

State v. Timothy B. Panknin
) & (2), 939.05, and 939.62(1)(c), Stats.[1] Panknin elected to seek postconviction relief, and counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12519 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
postconviction relief. ¶2 The case requires us to determine whether, in 1993, the Milwaukee County Circuit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141628 - 2017-09-21

Town of Delafield v. Eric Winkelman
, Defendants-Appellants. Opinion Filed: April 2, 2003 Oral Argument: February 12, 2003 JUDGES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5143 - 2005-03-31