Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2851 - 2860 of 29712 for des.

[PDF] NOTICE
is a question of law that we review de novo. Paige K.B. ex rel. Peterson v. Steven G.B., 226 Wis. 2d 210, 223
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=63179 - 2014-09-15

State v. Colleen M. Thomas
the issue de novo. See State v. Swanson, 164 Wis.2d 437, 445, 475 N.W.2d 148, 152 (1991). Nonetheless, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15727 - 2005-03-31

Paul G. Walker v. Eau Claire County Child Support Agency
to the claim and expunged the arrearage. Purvis moved the circuit court for a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15052 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
sentenced on inaccurate information is reviewed de novo. Id., ¶9. ¶10 The State concedes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144252 - 2015-07-13

Vicki Lyons v. Dunn County
¶11 We review a circuit court’s decision to grant summary judgment de novo, using the same
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5607 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Judith Moreno v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
. DISCUSSION ¶5 We review decisions on summary judgment de novo, applying the same methodology
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15996 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of facts are questions of law that we review de novo. Pritchard v. Madison Metro. Sch. Dist., 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=274517 - 2020-08-04

[PDF] NOTICE
summary judgment decisions de novo, using the same well-known methodology as the circuit court. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29202 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Jane A. Sliwinski
The reasonableness of a blood draw, which is a search, is a question of constitutional law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6015 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Elfriede Larson v. Tower Insurance Company, Inc.
summary judgment de novo using the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5283 - 2017-09-19