Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2851 - 2860 of 29796 for des.
Search results 2851 - 2860 of 29796 for des.
Mike Brolin v. Kim Bauers
of retaliation in making its factual findings. We review Bauers’ first contention de novo because it alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21508 - 2006-02-22
of retaliation in making its factual findings. We review Bauers’ first contention de novo because it alleges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21508 - 2006-02-22
State v. Shulbert Z. Williams
, whether the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2812 - 2005-03-31
, whether the deficient performance prejudiced the defendant are questions of law, which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2812 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28362 - 2014-09-15
We review questions of statutory interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28362 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Barbara Barritt v. Mary Carolyn Lowe
of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standard as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6020 - 2017-09-19
of summary judgment de novo, and we apply the same standard as the trial court. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6020 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Michael E. Schultz v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance
judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14860 - 2017-09-21
judgment de novo, using the same methodology as the trial court. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14860 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
review summary judgment decisions de novo. Young v. West Bend Mut. Ins. Co., 2008 WI App 147, ¶6, 314
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92477 - 2013-02-04
review summary judgment decisions de novo. Young v. West Bend Mut. Ins. Co., 2008 WI App 147, ¶6, 314
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92477 - 2013-02-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258, ¶26, 268 Wis. 2d 468, 673 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301006 - 2020-11-04
a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Ziebart, 2003 WI App 258, ¶26, 268 Wis. 2d 468, 673 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=301006 - 2020-11-04
State v. Camille N. Skotnicki
restitution in the first instance, given a particular set of facts, is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15921 - 2005-03-31
restitution in the first instance, given a particular set of facts, is a question of law which we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15921 - 2005-03-31
Donald Jensen v. A Complete Spa & Pool Supply Centre, Inc.
§ 402.201(1) is a question of law that we review de novo. See First Bank v. H.K.A. Enterprises, Inc., 183
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15844 - 2005-03-31
§ 402.201(1) is a question of law that we review de novo. See First Bank v. H.K.A. Enterprises, Inc., 183
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15844 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of facts are questions of law that we review de novo. Pritchard v. Madison Metro. Sch. Dist., 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=274517 - 2020-08-04
of facts are questions of law that we review de novo. Pritchard v. Madison Metro. Sch. Dist., 2001 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=274517 - 2020-08-04