Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2851 - 2860 of 24568 for extending.
Search results 2851 - 2860 of 24568 for extending.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
—that is, the August 2013 order extending the placement of Amelia’s children outside of her home—did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142876 - 2017-09-21
—that is, the August 2013 order extending the placement of Amelia’s children outside of her home—did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142876 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jeffrey B. Haines
of limitations is extended before the prior time limitation for prosecution has expired. We agree with the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16508 - 2005-03-31
of limitations is extended before the prior time limitation for prosecution has expired. We agree with the court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16508 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and two and a half years of extended supervision on each bail jumping count; one and a half years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186359 - 2017-09-21
and two and a half years of extended supervision on each bail jumping count; one and a half years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186359 - 2017-09-21
State v. Eduardo Jose Trigueros
, and twenty-four months of extended supervision. Trigueros’s lawyer asked the trial court for probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17661 - 2005-07-06
, and twenty-four months of extended supervision. Trigueros’s lawyer asked the trial court for probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17661 - 2005-07-06
State v. Scott G. Zuniga
consent, the State offered to recommend eighteen months of incarceration, one year of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4503 - 2005-03-31
consent, the State offered to recommend eighteen months of incarceration, one year of extended supervision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4503 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Scott G. Zuniga
, one year of extended supervision, both stayed, and four years of probation. On the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4503 - 2017-09-19
, one year of extended supervision, both stayed, and four years of probation. On the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4503 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentence of 15 years’ initial confinement and 10 years’ extended supervision. 5 The no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=637164 - 2023-03-29
sentence of 15 years’ initial confinement and 10 years’ extended supervision. 5 The no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=637164 - 2023-03-29
COURT OF APPEALS
to the commencement of this action—that is, the August 2013 order extending the placement of Amelia’s children outside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142876 - 2015-06-08
to the commencement of this action—that is, the August 2013 order extending the placement of Amelia’s children outside
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142876 - 2015-06-08
[PDF]
State v. William G. Henriksen
sentence would be five years, consisting of two years’ initial confinement and three years’ extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7378 - 2017-09-20
sentence would be five years, consisting of two years’ initial confinement and three years’ extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7378 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Darryl H. Stegall
an unreasonable condition of extended supervision. We affirm. I. ¶2 Stegall was charged with recklessly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6065 - 2017-09-19
an unreasonable condition of extended supervision. We affirm. I. ¶2 Stegall was charged with recklessly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6065 - 2017-09-19