Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2851 - 2860 of 82603 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
Search results 2851 - 2860 of 82603 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.
State v. Michael S. Piddington
of a published court of appeals decision that reversed a circuit court order which had suppressed the test
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17514 - 2005-03-31
of a published court of appeals decision that reversed a circuit court order which had suppressed the test
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17514 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James A. Sybers
was given the opportunity to provide a breath sample for the Intoxilyzer test but did not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5668 - 2017-09-19
was given the opportunity to provide a breath sample for the Intoxilyzer test but did not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5668 - 2017-09-19
State v. James A. Sybers
sample for the Intoxilyzer test but did not provide a sufficient breath sample and the officer therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5668 - 2005-03-31
sample for the Intoxilyzer test but did not provide a sufficient breath sample and the officer therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5668 - 2005-03-31
State v. James A. Sybers
sample for the Intoxilyzer test but did not provide a sufficient breath sample and the officer therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5360 - 2005-03-31
sample for the Intoxilyzer test but did not provide a sufficient breath sample and the officer therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5360 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James A. Sybers
was given the opportunity to provide a breath sample for the Intoxilyzer test but did not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5360 - 2017-09-19
was given the opportunity to provide a breath sample for the Intoxilyzer test but did not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5360 - 2017-09-19
Elizabeth P. v. Mark R.F.
and CROSS-APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: Dominic S. Amato, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12008 - 2005-03-31
and CROSS-APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: Dominic S. Amato, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12008 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Elizabeth P. v. Mark R.F.
-APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: DOMINIC S. AMATO, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12008 - 2017-09-21
-APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: DOMINIC S. AMATO, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12008 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2019AP1252 State of Wisconsin v. James
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308918 - 2020-12-01
that the Court has entered the following opinion and order: 2019AP1252 State of Wisconsin v. James
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=308918 - 2020-12-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: JAMES R. KIEFFER and DONALD J. HASSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142985 - 2017-09-21
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Waukesha County: JAMES R. KIEFFER and DONALD J. HASSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142985 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142985 - 2005-03-31
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142985 - 2005-03-31