Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28501 - 28510 of 82897 for simple case search.
Search results 28501 - 28510 of 82897 for simple case search.
2006 WI 121
2006 WI 121 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2004AP548-W Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27048 - 2013-02-20
2006 WI 121 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2004AP548-W Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27048 - 2013-02-20
[PDF]
Motion to File Amicus-Non-Party Brief (BLOC)
in this matter. Case 2021AP001450 Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief (BLOC) Filed 09-07-2021 Page 1 of 7
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/motfileamicusnpbriefbloc.pdf - 2021-10-18
in this matter. Case 2021AP001450 Motion to File Amicus/Non-Party Brief (BLOC) Filed 09-07-2021 Page 1 of 7
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/motfileamicusnpbriefbloc.pdf - 2021-10-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723485 - 2023-11-08
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723485 - 2023-11-08
State v. Floyd Worth
, which states: "A defendant in a criminal case has the absolute constitutional right not to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11046 - 2005-03-31
, which states: "A defendant in a criminal case has the absolute constitutional right not to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11046 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2008AP967-AC Cir. Ct. No. 2007CV304
that to be the case, and we accept it as the case. No. 2008AP967-AC 4 If a “personal use” exemption
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36322 - 2014-09-15
that to be the case, and we accept it as the case. No. 2008AP967-AC 4 If a “personal use” exemption
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36322 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723485 - 2023-11-08
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021-22).1 We affirm
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=723485 - 2023-11-08
State v. Fradario L. Brim
Brim was acquitted. In this case, he contends that joinder forced him to testify about the Anderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5336 - 2005-03-31
Brim was acquitted. In this case, he contends that joinder forced him to testify about the Anderson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5336 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
argument and affirm the order. BACKGROUND ¶2 In two Marathon County circuit court cases, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34815 - 2014-09-15
argument and affirm the order. BACKGROUND ¶2 In two Marathon County circuit court cases, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34815 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
County Circuit Court case No. 2011CF1361. On July 15, 2011, he was charged with one count of conspiracy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105319 - 2013-12-09
County Circuit Court case No. 2011CF1361. On July 15, 2011, he was charged with one count of conspiracy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105319 - 2013-12-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
case with third-offense OWI. He moved to collaterally attack his 2006 second-offense OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314384 - 2020-12-15
case with third-offense OWI. He moved to collaterally attack his 2006 second-offense OWI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=314384 - 2020-12-15