Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28511 - 28520 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
Search results 28511 - 28520 of 59253 for SMALL CLAIMS.
COURT OF APPEALS
. He claims the evidence presented at the commitment hearing was insufficient to support the orders.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55722 - 2010-10-18
. He claims the evidence presented at the commitment hearing was insufficient to support the orders.[2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55722 - 2010-10-18
State v. Timothy L.R.
prior to the date of his offense, and Timothy now claims that the juvenile court's decision to allow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10441 - 2005-03-31
prior to the date of his offense, and Timothy now claims that the juvenile court's decision to allow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10441 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
guilty plea.[1] Kamin filed a response claiming he was innocent and was framed by the fifteen-year-old
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101898 - 2013-09-16
guilty plea.[1] Kamin filed a response claiming he was innocent and was framed by the fifteen-year-old
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101898 - 2013-09-16
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141690 - 2017-09-21
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141690 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles V. Royster
) and 939.62 (2003-04).[2] Royster requests only that the order be vacated and he be resentenced. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24971 - 2006-05-01
) and 939.62 (2003-04).[2] Royster requests only that the order be vacated and he be resentenced. He claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24971 - 2006-05-01
[PDF]
State v. Karl P. Breitweiser
¶5 The State contends that Breitweiser’s claim is unfounded because the time period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4567 - 2017-09-19
¶5 The State contends that Breitweiser’s claim is unfounded because the time period
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4567 - 2017-09-19
State v. Willie C. Fondren
ineffective assistance of counsel. A defendant claiming ineffective assistance of counsel so substandard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3948 - 2005-03-31
ineffective assistance of counsel. A defendant claiming ineffective assistance of counsel so substandard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3948 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
withdrawal for an erroneous exercise of discretion. Id. For plea withdrawal based on a claim of newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66673 - 2011-06-28
withdrawal for an erroneous exercise of discretion. Id. For plea withdrawal based on a claim of newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66673 - 2011-06-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to address claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel if the issue was not raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863478 - 2024-10-22
to address claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel if the issue was not raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863478 - 2024-10-22
[PDF]
Robert Kreuter v. City of Franklin
misconstrued the well agreement. We reject their claim and affirm the judgment.1 Kreuter and Yunker owned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7978 - 2017-09-19
misconstrued the well agreement. We reject their claim and affirm the judgment.1 Kreuter and Yunker owned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7978 - 2017-09-19