Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28511 - 28520 of 63530 for records.
Search results 28511 - 28520 of 63530 for records.
[PDF]
NOTICE
upon testimony in the record and were not clearly erroneous. ¶12 Patrick’s primary contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31177 - 2014-09-15
upon testimony in the record and were not clearly erroneous. ¶12 Patrick’s primary contention
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31177 - 2014-09-15
State v. Stanley H. Graewin
by the trial court so long as the court considered the facts of record under the proper legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15734 - 2005-03-31
by the trial court so long as the court considered the facts of record under the proper legal standard
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15734 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
on mischaracterization of the circuit’s court’s decision, facts outside the record, and allegations the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45341 - 2014-09-15
on mischaracterization of the circuit’s court’s decision, facts outside the record, and allegations the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=45341 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
that there was insufficient justification for police to conduct an investigative stop, the record demonstrates otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27589 - 2014-09-15
that there was insufficient justification for police to conduct an investigative stop, the record demonstrates otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27589 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
applied a proper standard of law to the facts of record. Id. We independently determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36053 - 2014-09-15
applied a proper standard of law to the facts of record. Id. We independently determine whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36053 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107054 - 2017-09-21
this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107054 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court concludes that no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251122 - 2019-12-06
record as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), this court concludes that no issue
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251122 - 2019-12-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 response, and did not do so. We have independently reviewed the records and the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968144 - 2025-06-10
2 response, and did not do so. We have independently reviewed the records and the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=968144 - 2025-06-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
decision was pending, the record does not establish that the decision makers knew anything about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243197 - 2019-07-03
decision was pending, the record does not establish that the decision makers knew anything about
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243197 - 2019-07-03
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the record, and he knew the court routinely read the documents in the record before sentencing. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912649 - 2025-02-12
the record, and he knew the court routinely read the documents in the record before sentencing. Counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=912649 - 2025-02-12