Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28511 - 28520 of 58480 for speedy trial.
Search results 28511 - 28520 of 58480 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 974.06 (2015-16) motion. 1 Leblanc contends his trial counsel was ineffective because he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217482 - 2018-08-07
. § 974.06 (2015-16) motion. 1 Leblanc contends his trial counsel was ineffective because he did
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=217482 - 2018-08-07
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the issues in the context of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, the issues can be reframed as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698827 - 2023-09-06
the issues in the context of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, the issues can be reframed as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698827 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
requesting a new trial and demand for exculpatory evidence” without a hearing.1 Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698571 - 2023-09-06
requesting a new trial and demand for exculpatory evidence” without a hearing.1 Based upon our review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698571 - 2023-09-06
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment. The trial court ruled in favor of the Doctors, concluding that, when Pool funds existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102237 - 2013-10-22
judgment. The trial court ruled in favor of the Doctors, concluding that, when Pool funds existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102237 - 2013-10-22
State v. Rodney Calhoun
anything wrong. The trial court set a trial date for the first case. On August 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9760 - 2005-03-31
anything wrong. The trial court set a trial date for the first case. On August 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9760 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rodney Calhoun
anything wrong. The trial court set a trial date for the first case. On August 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9761 - 2005-03-31
anything wrong. The trial court set a trial date for the first case. On August 2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9761 - 2005-03-31
Richard E. Carter v. Audrey B. Schram
, the trial court concluded that the easement was personal to Carter and was not a permanent restriction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11487 - 2005-03-31
, the trial court concluded that the easement was personal to Carter and was not a permanent restriction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11487 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
DLK Enterprises, Inc. v. Alan J. Rogers
to the remaining partners. The trial court dismissed the complaint against the Williamses and Joseph, concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9410 - 2017-09-19
to the remaining partners. The trial court dismissed the complaint against the Williamses and Joseph, concluding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9410 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that the evidence at trial was insufficient as to the lone count that alleged sexual assault of a child under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017683 - 2025-10-01
that the evidence at trial was insufficient as to the lone count that alleged sexual assault of a child under
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017683 - 2025-10-01
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
filed a postconviction motion challenging trial counsel’s effectiveness at sentencing, but the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90916 - 2014-09-15
filed a postconviction motion challenging trial counsel’s effectiveness at sentencing, but the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90916 - 2014-09-15