Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28531 - 28540 of 62323 for child support.
Search results 28531 - 28540 of 62323 for child support.
[PDF]
Reginald D. Phillips v. Department of Public Instruction
not supported by substantial evidence in the record. Id. WIS. ADM. CODE § PI 3.04(2)(a) provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7841 - 2017-09-19
not supported by substantial evidence in the record. Id. WIS. ADM. CODE § PI 3.04(2)(a) provides
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7841 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
must allege facts supporting plea withdrawal in the petition and cannot rely merely on conclusory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29127 - 2007-06-26
must allege facts supporting plea withdrawal in the petition and cannot rely merely on conclusory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29127 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Kobleske has made no cogent argument to support his claim that the victim’s decision not to report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121446 - 2014-09-16
, Kobleske has made no cogent argument to support his claim that the victim’s decision not to report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121446 - 2014-09-16
State v. James R. Donohoo
followed by engaging in proscribed protest activities is sufficient to support the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8563 - 2005-03-31
followed by engaging in proscribed protest activities is sufficient to support the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8563 - 2005-03-31
County of Green Lake v. John D. Pearson
be established to support a motion to reopen under the statute. We therefore affirm the court’s order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15292 - 2005-03-31
be established to support a motion to reopen under the statute. We therefore affirm the court’s order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15292 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
requested a hearing within the ten-day period. Sheedy provides nothing to support his assertion that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142621 - 2015-06-02
requested a hearing within the ten-day period. Sheedy provides nothing to support his assertion that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142621 - 2015-06-02
Certification
, police obtained evidence supporting the issuance of a search warrant for Williams’ residence
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67967 - 2011-07-13
, police obtained evidence supporting the issuance of a search warrant for Williams’ residence
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67967 - 2011-07-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
does not support this argument with a developed analysis that discusses the interplay of harassment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347313 - 2021-03-18
does not support this argument with a developed analysis that discusses the interplay of harassment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347313 - 2021-03-18
COURT OF APPEALS
of Contraband). Kramer argues that the finding was arbitrary and not supported by the evidence because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33345 - 2008-07-09
of Contraband). Kramer argues that the finding was arbitrary and not supported by the evidence because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33345 - 2008-07-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to hear testimony in support of the County’s petition at the plea hearing, contrary to WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121040 - 2014-09-15
to hear testimony in support of the County’s petition at the plea hearing, contrary to WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121040 - 2014-09-15