Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28531 - 28540 of 39843 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 28531 - 28540 of 39843 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Pedro Figueroa
, failed to obtain statements from V.R., her mother, Ana, and V.R.’s sister, Corrine, and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18032 - 2005-05-10
, failed to obtain statements from V.R., her mother, Ana, and V.R.’s sister, Corrine, and failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18032 - 2005-05-10
State v. Jeffrey L. Watson
breached its plea agreement because its statements at the sentencing hearing did not support the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14117 - 2005-03-31
breached its plea agreement because its statements at the sentencing hearing did not support the sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14117 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). No. 2011AP2129 7 following statement: “Owner understands that [BDL] acts as their agent for all labor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83028 - 2014-09-15
). No. 2011AP2129 7 following statement: “Owner understands that [BDL] acts as their agent for all labor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83028 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
contradicted his guilty plea.” Id., ¶23. Echols compares the prosecutor’s statement in Sprang to the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73090 - 2011-10-31
contradicted his guilty plea.” Id., ¶23. Echols compares the prosecutor’s statement in Sprang to the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73090 - 2011-10-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
they are clearly 7 As both parties point out, these statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040888 - 2025-11-25
they are clearly 7 As both parties point out, these statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1040888 - 2025-11-25
CA Blank Order
easier.” He claims this statement induced his plea, and his argument implies that the statement relates
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103136 - 2013-10-17
easier.” He claims this statement induced his plea, and his argument implies that the statement relates
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103136 - 2013-10-17
State v. Ronald D. Hull
next to the court’s statement that “there certainly is an inference that … Hull would have seen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2668 - 2005-03-31
next to the court’s statement that “there certainly is an inference that … Hull would have seen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2668 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the 2 The statement of facts in Slocum’s brief consist of two paragraphs. Drake, in contrast
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756250 - 2024-01-30
of the 2 The statement of facts in Slocum’s brief consist of two paragraphs. Drake, in contrast
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=756250 - 2024-01-30
[PDF]
State v. Cleophus Amerson
). The corroboration requirement is met if: “(1) there is a feasible motive for the initial false statement; and, (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13460 - 2017-09-21
). The corroboration requirement is met if: “(1) there is a feasible motive for the initial false statement; and, (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13460 - 2017-09-21
James Mews v. Wisconsin Department of Commerce
(1), which states in relevant part: “Each agency shall promulgate as a rule each statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6033 - 2005-03-31
(1), which states in relevant part: “Each agency shall promulgate as a rule each statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6033 - 2005-03-31