Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28531 - 28540 of 45831 for paternity test paper work.

[PDF] State v. Richard E. Davis
is not constitutionally ineffective unless both elements of the test are satisfied, State v. Guck, 170 Wis.2d 661, 669
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14557 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Patty E. Jorgensen
field sobriety tests and was arrested for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. ¶5 On July
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4464 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, we apply the well-established test in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=727913 - 2023-11-14

State v. Eric J. Hendrickson
that actuarial tests placed Hendrickson in the high risk category for reoffending. ¶4 Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6140 - 2005-03-31

Tayr Kilaab al Ghashiyah (Khan) v. Michael Sullivan
of § 304.06(1r) (1993-94) under a “mandatory language” test employed in Hewitt v. Helms, 459 U.S. 460, 472
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4625 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. To evaluate Parks’ claims of ineffective assistance, we apply the familiar two-prong test described
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=431151 - 2021-09-28

[PDF] State v. Rickey A. Taylor
it as such, meeting certainly the test of the excited utterance rule. That was reasonable, and a proper exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7338 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
prongs of the Sullivan test. Dorsey, 379 Wis. 2d 386, ¶33. Pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 904.04(2)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=763337 - 2024-02-13

[PDF] State v. Chad Everts
pronounced the proper test, that it had not conducted the proper test at the time of the original motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3758 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] James E. Vieau v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
be ambiguous within the context of an insurance contract. Id. The test for contextual ambiguity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7527 - 2017-09-19