Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28541 - 28550 of 63529 for records.
Search results 28541 - 28550 of 63529 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
). We search the record for reasons to sustain a trial court’s discretionary decision. State v. Odom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116156 - 2014-07-07
). We search the record for reasons to sustain a trial court’s discretionary decision. State v. Odom
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116156 - 2014-07-07
[PDF]
State v. Bashar Elramahi
, and the defendant must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence disputed. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14239 - 2014-09-15
, and the defendant must show some unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence disputed. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14239 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Henry Bowles
not record those checks in the joint-venture checkbook ledgers, and did not disclose to Payne and Dolan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14877 - 2017-09-21
not record those checks in the joint-venture checkbook ledgers, and did not disclose to Payne and Dolan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14877 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Brian C. Miller
, was searched again and his written statement taken. Three of the buys were recorded. The first buy occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14893 - 2017-09-21
, was searched again and his written statement taken. Three of the buys were recorded. The first buy occurred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14893 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Nick Allen
the officers did what they did next. The record does not support these conclusions by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10693 - 2017-09-20
the officers did what they did next. The record does not support these conclusions by the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10693 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
psychotropic medications. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, no issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103200 - 2017-09-21
psychotropic medications. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, no issue of arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103200 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
medication. The record does not support this determination. Dr. Drexler testified that Hardy accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650821 - 2023-05-02
medication. The record does not support this determination. Dr. Drexler testified that Hardy accepted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=650821 - 2023-05-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. Based upon our independent review of the record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257761 - 2020-04-21
a response. Based upon our independent review of the record and the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=257761 - 2020-04-21
COURT OF APPEALS
it? I said on the record we would clear that up later. I don’t know why you would do that. You know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30451 - 2005-10-01
it? I said on the record we would clear that up later. I don’t know why you would do that. You know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30451 - 2005-10-01
COURT OF APPEALS
, and there is nothing in the Record that even hints that the company did not do a good job. But that is not the problem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31864 - 2008-02-19
, and there is nothing in the Record that even hints that the company did not do a good job. But that is not the problem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31864 - 2008-02-19