Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28551 - 28560 of 29966 for de.
Search results 28551 - 28560 of 29966 for de.
William E. Marberry v. Phillip G. Macht
). Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Curiel, 227 Wis. 2d 389, 404
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15998 - 2005-03-31
). Statutory interpretation is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Curiel, 227 Wis. 2d 389, 404
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15998 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael D. M.
that, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2671 - 2005-03-31
that, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2671 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that we review de novo. For the following reasons, we conclude that qualified immunity applies here.[6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135983 - 2015-02-25
that we review de novo. For the following reasons, we conclude that qualified immunity applies here.[6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135983 - 2015-02-25
[PDF]
NOTICE
Heinemeier’s complaint. This appeal follows. II. ANALYSIS. ¶18 We review a summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28756 - 2014-09-15
Heinemeier’s complaint. This appeal follows. II. ANALYSIS. ¶18 We review a summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28756 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 42
standards to undisputed facts, questions of law that we review de novo. See Butzlaff v. DHFS, 223 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94147 - 2014-09-15
standards to undisputed facts, questions of law that we review de novo. See Butzlaff v. DHFS, 223 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94147 - 2014-09-15
WI App 42 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2410 Complete Title of...
review de novo. See Butzlaff v. DHFS, 223 Wis. 2d 673, 679, 590 N.W.2d 9 (Ct. App. 1998). ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94147 - 2013-04-23
review de novo. See Butzlaff v. DHFS, 223 Wis. 2d 673, 679, 590 N.W.2d 9 (Ct. App. 1998). ¶16
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94147 - 2013-04-23
COURT OF APPEALS
. Const. amend. VI; Wis. Const. art. I, § 7. We review de novo whether a trial court’s decision to admit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60643 - 2011-03-02
. Const. amend. VI; Wis. Const. art. I, § 7. We review de novo whether a trial court’s decision to admit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60643 - 2011-03-02
State v. Vairin M.
Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo, Teague v. Bad River Band
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16485 - 2005-03-31
Statutory interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo, Teague v. Bad River Band
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16485 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark Inglin
jurisdiction presents an issue of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Webster, 196 Wis.2d 308, 316
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13173 - 2017-09-21
jurisdiction presents an issue of law, which we review de novo. See State v. Webster, 196 Wis.2d 308, 316
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13173 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and applicable law Right to a speedy trial ¶17 We review de novo the question of law of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237927 - 2019-03-26
and applicable law Right to a speedy trial ¶17 We review de novo the question of law of whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237927 - 2019-03-26