Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28551 - 28560 of 29821 for des.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is enforceable under this statute is a question of law that we review de novo. Waite v. Easton-White Creek
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1066781 - 2026-01-23

[PDF] State v. Charles W. Mark
. Whether the court’s construction is correct presents a question of law, which we review de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6732 - 2017-09-20

Frontsheet
decisions under ch. 227 envisages a review upon the [agency] record, and there is no trial de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36829 - 2009-06-16

[PDF] Frontsheet
erroneous standard and review conclusions of law de novo. Runyon, 393 Wis. 2d 612, ¶11. We determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593973 - 2023-01-25

[PDF] WI 53
. 227 envisages a review upon the [agency] record, and there is no trial de novo in the circuit court
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36855 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 19
)(a) & 938.31(3)(c)1. No. 2013AP127-CR 21 This is a question of law we review de novo. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=106680 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Michael A. Grindemann
, but review de novo a conclusion that it is. ¶43 In Wuensch, Ralph, and Hayes, the courts affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3657 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI App 45
relief on the first issue in this appeal. Separately, because, on our de novo review, we interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=978536 - 2025-09-18

WI App 2 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP3137 Complete Title of ...
affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment, although on different grounds. ¶33 We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90102 - 2013-11-17

[PDF] State v. Ronnie J. Frayer
de novo. Id. Whether a defendant has standing to raise a Fourth Amendment claim also presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2521 - 2017-09-19