Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28561 - 28570 of 63537 for records.
Search results 28561 - 28570 of 63537 for records.
State v. Kyle W.F.
at the fact-finding hearing to be acknowledging that was an error. [3] There is no evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16111 - 2005-03-31
at the fact-finding hearing to be acknowledging that was an error. [3] There is no evidence in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16111 - 2005-03-31
Douglas Dahlin, Jr. v. James B. Dahlin
of the record in light of the applicable legal authority satisfies us that, as a matter of law, James presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16124 - 2005-03-31
of the record in light of the applicable legal authority satisfies us that, as a matter of law, James presented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16124 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
legal standard to the facts of record and reaches a reasonable result. Hughes v. Hughes, 223 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38467 - 2009-07-28
legal standard to the facts of record and reaches a reasonable result. Hughes v. Hughes, 223 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38467 - 2009-07-28
State v. Walter W. Karnstein
having to reverse, we think it necessary to disabuse him of that notion. The record does not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5307 - 2005-03-31
having to reverse, we think it necessary to disabuse him of that notion. The record does not show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5307 - 2005-03-31
CJT & L, Inc. v. Daryl A. Larson
. 1983). A reviewing court will not reverse a circuit court’s discretionary determination if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21162 - 2006-03-22
. 1983). A reviewing court will not reverse a circuit court’s discretionary determination if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21162 - 2006-03-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the appellate records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926438 - 2025-03-18
not responded. Upon our independent review of the appellate records as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=926438 - 2025-03-18
State v. Wang Meng Yang
will affirm the trial court's decision if the record shows that the court considered the facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7996 - 2005-03-31
will affirm the trial court's decision if the record shows that the court considered the facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7996 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ruben F. Herrera
by a party opponent is not hearsay. “If the trial court's decision is supportable by the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7987 - 2005-03-31
by a party opponent is not hearsay. “If the trial court's decision is supportable by the record, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7987 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of its own records and proceedings for all proper purposes. This is particularly true when the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98457 - 2014-09-15
of its own records and proceedings for all proper purposes. This is particularly true when the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98457 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to dismiss his latest case with or without prejudice. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983337 - 2025-07-16
to dismiss his latest case with or without prejudice. Based upon our review of the briefs and Record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983337 - 2025-07-16