Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28571 - 28580 of 29823 for des.
Search results 28571 - 28580 of 29823 for des.
[PDF]
Jerold J. Mackenzie v. Miller Brewing Company
a cause of action in tort is a question of law subject to de novo review. Slawek v. Stroh, 62 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17330 - 2017-09-21
a cause of action in tort is a question of law subject to de novo review. Slawek v. Stroh, 62 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17330 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
entitle the defendant to an evidentiary hearing presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347582 - 2021-03-16
entitle the defendant to an evidentiary hearing presents a question of law that we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=347582 - 2021-03-16
[PDF]
Emil E. Jankee v. Clark County
. DISCUSSION We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9477 - 2017-09-19
. DISCUSSION We review summary judgments de novo, employing the same methodology as the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9477 - 2017-09-19
Frontsheet
decisions under ch. 227 envisages a review upon the [agency] record, and there is no trial de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36829 - 2009-06-16
decisions under ch. 227 envisages a review upon the [agency] record, and there is no trial de novo
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36829 - 2009-06-16
[PDF]
Frontsheet
erroneous standard and review conclusions of law de novo. Runyon, 393 Wis. 2d 612, ¶11. We determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593973 - 2023-01-25
erroneous standard and review conclusions of law de novo. Runyon, 393 Wis. 2d 612, ¶11. We determine
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=593973 - 2023-01-25
[PDF]
State v. Paul J. Stuart
raises a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Wurtz, 141 Wis. 2d 795, 799, 416 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16510 - 2017-09-21
raises a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Wurtz, 141 Wis. 2d 795, 799, 416 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16510 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189396 - 2017-09-21
. Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Eisenberg, 2004 WI 14
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189396 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Certification
, appellate courts review questions of statutory interpretation de novo, State v. Lickes, 2020 WI App 59
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939190 - 2025-04-09
, appellate courts review questions of statutory interpretation de novo, State v. Lickes, 2020 WI App 59
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=939190 - 2025-04-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of qualified attorney immunity presents a legal issue that we review de novo. For the following reasons, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135983 - 2017-09-21
of qualified attorney immunity presents a legal issue that we review de novo. For the following reasons, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135983 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
satisfies its “burden of proof under WIS. STAT. § 706.04 is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563503 - 2022-09-09
satisfies its “burden of proof under WIS. STAT. § 706.04 is a question of law we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=563503 - 2022-09-09