Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28571 - 28580 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 28571 - 28580 of 40036 for financial disclosure statement.
COURT OF APPEALS
contradicted his guilty plea.” Id., ¶23. Echols compares the prosecutor’s statement in Sprang to the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73090 - 2011-10-31
contradicted his guilty plea.” Id., ¶23. Echols compares the prosecutor’s statement in Sprang to the State’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73090 - 2011-10-31
COURT OF APPEALS
asserting that the Final Report and physician’s statements regarding that report were confidential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59949 - 2011-02-15
asserting that the Final Report and physician’s statements regarding that report were confidential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59949 - 2011-02-15
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey L. Watson
that the State breached its plea agreement because its statements at the sentencing hearing did not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14117 - 2014-09-15
that the State breached its plea agreement because its statements at the sentencing hearing did not support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14117 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
6 We infer that by making this statement, the State was waiving any concerns it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197435 - 2017-10-10
6 We infer that by making this statement, the State was waiving any concerns it had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197435 - 2017-10-10
State v. Cleophus Amerson
). The corroboration requirement is met if: “(1) there is a feasible motive for the initial false statement; and, (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13460 - 2005-03-31
). The corroboration requirement is met if: “(1) there is a feasible motive for the initial false statement; and, (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13460 - 2005-03-31
State v. Elmer J. K.
if and only if the record does not reflect a reasonable basis for the determination or a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14280 - 2005-03-31
if and only if the record does not reflect a reasonable basis for the determination or a statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14280 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
.” ¶9 The trial court found that the statements went to Forester-Hoare’s state of mind and intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110501 - 2014-04-22
.” ¶9 The trial court found that the statements went to Forester-Hoare’s state of mind and intent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110501 - 2014-04-22
Houghton Wood Products, Inc. v. Badger Wood Products, Inc.
of wood. The front of each invoice contains the following statements: PAST DUE ACCOUNTS WILL BE CHARGED 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8455 - 2005-03-31
of wood. The front of each invoice contains the following statements: PAST DUE ACCOUNTS WILL BE CHARGED 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8455 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Elmer J. K.
a reasonable basis for the determination or a statement of the relevant facts or reasons motivating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14280 - 2014-09-15
a reasonable basis for the determination or a statement of the relevant facts or reasons motivating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14280 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
.” The State argued that, because Marinez had no warrants out for his arrest, this statement implied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56014 - 2010-10-27
.” The State argued that, because Marinez had no warrants out for his arrest, this statement implied
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56014 - 2010-10-27