Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28571 - 28580 of 63539 for records.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
records, text messages, and pictures—submitted by the Petitioner, and thus he contends that evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471216 - 2022-01-11

COURT OF APPEALS
, 258 Wis. 2d 796, ¶9. Upon review of the record and the proceedings in Funches I, we agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98457 - 2013-06-25

[PDF] State v. Stance Williamson, Jr.
, Search and Seizure sec.3.3(c) at 525 (2d ed. 1987). Further, the record does not reveal that Nash
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10325 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92432 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
systematically underrepresents Black Americans because Winnebago County uses records from the Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=813647 - 2024-06-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
.” While the no-merit response does not further explain the basis for this claim, the record also
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=841736 - 2024-08-27

[PDF] WI APP 18
612, 665 N.W.2d 212. ¶7 At a WIS. STAT. § 74.37 trial, the court is not confined to the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34746 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. Thus, the decision must reflect a reasoning process based on the facts on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101011 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. § 946.49(1)(b) (2013-14). Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240422 - 2019-05-06

[PDF] NOTICE
the motion without an evidentiary hearing is not a misuse of discretion if the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28279 - 2014-09-15