Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28581 - 28590 of 30059 for de.
Search results 28581 - 28590 of 30059 for de.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. D.K., 390 Wis. 2d 50, ¶16. ¶24 Our supreme court recently addressed the mootness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=561036 - 2022-08-30
review de novo. D.K., 390 Wis. 2d 50, ¶16. ¶24 Our supreme court recently addressed the mootness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=561036 - 2022-08-30
[PDF]
WI App 45
relief on the first issue in this appeal. Separately, because, on our de novo review, we interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=978536 - 2025-09-18
relief on the first issue in this appeal. Separately, because, on our de novo review, we interpret
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=978536 - 2025-09-18
WI App 2 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP3137 Complete Title of ...
affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment, although on different grounds. ¶33 We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90102 - 2013-11-17
affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment, although on different grounds. ¶33 We review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90102 - 2013-11-17
[PDF]
WI APP 21
the interpretation of a statute, is generally a question of law, subject to de novo review. Brown v. Brown, 177
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27904 - 2014-09-15
the interpretation of a statute, is generally a question of law, subject to de novo review. Brown v. Brown, 177
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27904 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 229
court refused. This appeal followed. Standard of Review ¶21 We review statutory construction de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26797 - 2014-09-15
court refused. This appeal followed. Standard of Review ¶21 We review statutory construction de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26797 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a matter of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶15. ¶27 In an objective bias analysis, the party asserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932652 - 2025-03-25
is a matter of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶15. ¶27 In an objective bias analysis, the party asserting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=932652 - 2025-03-25
2007 WI 25
by a government agent is a question of constitutional law, which we review de novo. State v. Dixon, 177 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28211 - 2007-02-21
by a government agent is a question of constitutional law, which we review de novo. State v. Dixon, 177 Wis. 2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28211 - 2007-02-21
[PDF]
WI App 58
. (emphasis added). ¶22 While we review de novo whether the evidence presented at the preliminary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=276546 - 2020-10-13
. (emphasis added). ¶22 While we review de novo whether the evidence presented at the preliminary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=276546 - 2020-10-13
[PDF]
State v. Ronnie J. Frayer
de novo. Id. Whether a defendant has standing to raise a Fourth Amendment claim also presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2521 - 2017-09-19
de novo. Id. Whether a defendant has standing to raise a Fourth Amendment claim also presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2521 - 2017-09-19
State v. Lance R. Ward
). Our review of the magistrate’s probable cause determination is not de novo; rather, we pay “great
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12738 - 2005-03-31
). Our review of the magistrate’s probable cause determination is not de novo; rather, we pay “great
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12738 - 2005-03-31