Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28581 - 28590 of 63489 for promissory note/1000.

Wendy Pero v. Donald Lucas
background, noting that the 2001 Order “indicated that the parties are to return to court, or may return
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25088 - 2006-06-27

State v. Mustafa M. Mohammad
and into the street,” noted the odors of smoke and gasoline emanating from the ground floor of the building, reentered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14205 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
) No. 2023AP983-CR 8 further note that, in arguing its case to the jury, the prosecution did not rely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=966007 - 2025-06-05

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 5, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
terms of the agreement, Article 2.6, as noted, provides in relevant part: As of [February 17], 1972, L
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27315 - 2006-12-06

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
Court noted that "[t]he benchmark for judging any claim of ineffectiveness must be whether counsel's
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17516 - 2005-03-31

State v. Sheldon C. Stank
of law enforcement. We note that in this case, the warrant-issuing court did hear about Oehler’s motives
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20051 - 2005-12-11

State v. Mack S.
. was in error. ¶6 Barry S. has correctly noted that there are no published cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7653 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
otherwise noted. [2] The parties agree that, although Flint originally sued Noble personally, the proper
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33745 - 2008-08-13

[PDF] State v. Sammy J. Dickey
are to the 1999-2000 version unless otherwise noted. No. 01-0421-CR 2 when it allowed blood test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3615 - 2017-09-19

State v. Mark D. O'Kray
As noted above, the dispositive issue in this case is whether O’Kray’s plea was knowingly and voluntarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12175 - 2005-03-31