Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2861 - 2870 of 30059 for de.
Search results 2861 - 2870 of 30059 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Id. ¶7 The State contends that the officer had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66421 - 2011-06-22
to constitutional principles, which we review de novo.” Id. ¶7 The State contends that the officer had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66421 - 2011-06-22
[PDF]
State v. Kris A. Westberg
facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571-72, 570 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5572 - 2017-09-19
facts, a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Foust, 214 Wis. 2d 568, 571-72, 570 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5572 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. William Oscar Marquis
of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Drexler, 199 Wis.2d 128, 133, 544 N.W.2d 903 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10103 - 2017-09-19
of law subject to de novo review.” State v. Drexler, 199 Wis.2d 128, 133, 544 N.W.2d 903 (Ct. App. 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10103 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court’s findings of fact, but, of course, review de novo the trial court’s legal conclusions. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90674 - 2014-09-15
court’s findings of fact, but, of course, review de novo the trial court’s legal conclusions. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90674 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and dismissed Chula Vista’s claims. Chula Vista now appeals. ¶5 We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546539 - 2022-07-21
and dismissed Chula Vista’s claims. Chula Vista now appeals. ¶5 We review summary judgment de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546539 - 2022-07-21
[PDF]
State v. Tammy F.
of statutory construction and interpretation. We review such questions de novo. See DOR v. Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9110 - 2017-09-19
of statutory construction and interpretation. We review such questions de novo. See DOR v. Milwaukee
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9110 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
, and Florstar Sales, presents a legal issue that we review de novo. See, e.g., Kailin v. Armstrong, 2002 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28637 - 2007-04-02
, and Florstar Sales, presents a legal issue that we review de novo. See, e.g., Kailin v. Armstrong, 2002 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28637 - 2007-04-02
2006 WI APP 205
This appeal requires us to apply Wis. Stat. § 632.32(4m).[3] Our review is thus de novo. See Dorbritz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26218 - 2006-10-30
This appeal requires us to apply Wis. Stat. § 632.32(4m).[3] Our review is thus de novo. See Dorbritz v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26218 - 2006-10-30
COURT OF APPEALS
for reconsideration raised a new issue “presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47472 - 2010-03-02
for reconsideration raised a new issue “presents a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47472 - 2010-03-02
[PDF]
Manor Park Village v. Robin Spoden
of the case. The application of a statute to a set of facts is an issue we decide de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9750 - 2017-09-19
of the case. The application of a statute to a set of facts is an issue we decide de novo, without deference
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9750 - 2017-09-19