Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2861 - 2870 of 9119 for op.
Search results 2861 - 2870 of 9119 for op.
COURT OF APPEALS
, unpublished slip op. (WI App Nov. 7, 2006) (Omegbu I). He also purports to appeal from the final orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34675 - 2008-11-24
, unpublished slip op. (WI App Nov. 7, 2006) (Omegbu I). He also purports to appeal from the final orders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34675 - 2008-11-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, No. 2020AP395-CR, unpublished slip op., ¶20 (WI App July 20, 2021) (“Moffett I”). We therefore remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032489 - 2025-11-04
, No. 2020AP395-CR, unpublished slip op., ¶20 (WI App July 20, 2021) (“Moffett I”). We therefore remanded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032489 - 2025-11-04
[PDF]
William J. Faber v. Josephine W. Musser
conclude that the 1 Faber v. Musser, No. 95-0968, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17007 - 2017-09-21
conclude that the 1 Faber v. Musser, No. 95-0968, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17007 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
slip op. ¶¶2-11 (WI App Feb. 1, 2006), and we will not rehash them here. The facts essential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27875 - 2014-09-15
slip op. ¶¶2-11 (WI App Feb. 1, 2006), and we will not rehash them here. The facts essential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27875 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Peacock, No. 2002AP1574, unpublished slip op. (WI App Dec. 11, 2002) that he found was factually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36350 - 2014-09-15
. Peacock, No. 2002AP1574, unpublished slip op. (WI App Dec. 11, 2002) that he found was factually
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36350 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
). ruled on the issue. As we observed in Kekula v. Corish, No. 2014AP177, unpublished slip op. ¶34 (WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142512 - 2017-09-21
). ruled on the issue. As we observed in Kekula v. Corish, No. 2014AP177, unpublished slip op. ¶34 (WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142512 - 2017-09-21
State v. Daymon D. Tate
the judgment and order of the trial court. State v. Tate, No. 97-3401-CR, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6148 - 2005-03-31
the judgment and order of the trial court. State v. Tate, No. 97-3401-CR, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6148 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
op. ¶1 (WI App May 31, 2007). Following a hearing, the circuit court denied the motion. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910071 - 2025-02-04
op. ¶1 (WI App May 31, 2007). Following a hearing, the circuit court denied the motion. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910071 - 2025-02-04
State v. Lawrence P. Hoffman
to us after remand. See State v. Hoffman, No. 01‑2740‑CR, unpublished slip op. (WI App June 26, 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7003 - 2005-03-31
to us after remand. See State v. Hoffman, No. 01‑2740‑CR, unpublished slip op. (WI App June 26, 2002
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7003 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christopher L. Berry
op. (Wis. Ct. App. Sept. 1, 1993). ¶3 In June 2001, Berry moved for postconviction relief under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4697 - 2017-09-19
op. (Wis. Ct. App. Sept. 1, 1993). ¶3 In June 2001, Berry moved for postconviction relief under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4697 - 2017-09-19