Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 2861 - 2870 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 2861 - 2870 of 58458 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED May 8, 2012 Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Court of Appeals...
an order denying his motions for postconviction relief. Alexander contends that: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82144 - 2012-05-07
an order denying his motions for postconviction relief. Alexander contends that: (1) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82144 - 2012-05-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
counsel provided ineffective assistance; and (2) that he is entitled to a new trial based upon newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41717 - 2014-09-15
counsel provided ineffective assistance; and (2) that he is entitled to a new trial based upon newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=41717 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance; and (2) that he is entitled to a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41717 - 2009-10-05
assistance; and (2) that he is entitled to a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence. Because we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41717 - 2009-10-05
Florian Joseph Smith v. Eleanor Bernice Smith
a trial court order that denied her § 806.07, Stats., motion seeking to reopen a divorce judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13056 - 2005-03-31
a trial court order that denied her § 806.07, Stats., motion seeking to reopen a divorce judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13056 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Florian Joseph Smith v. Eleanor Bernice Smith
CURIAM. Eleanor Smith appeals a trial court order that denied her § 806.07, STATS., motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13056 - 2017-09-21
CURIAM. Eleanor Smith appeals a trial court order that denied her § 806.07, STATS., motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13056 - 2017-09-21
State v. Daniel G.H.
that because Daniel did not have a right to a jury trial, its decision was not binding. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3630 - 2005-03-31
that because Daniel did not have a right to a jury trial, its decision was not binding. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3630 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel G.H.
obligation. The State cross-appeals and argues that because Daniel did not have a right to a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3630 - 2017-09-19
obligation. The State cross-appeals and argues that because Daniel did not have a right to a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3630 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Thomas Jelinski v. Michael Barr
was tried to the court on February 17, 1999. A written trial court decision was filed on March 25, 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15473 - 2017-09-21
was tried to the court on February 17, 1999. A written trial court decision was filed on March 25, 1999
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15473 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
permission to search his person or the vehicle. In an oral decision, the trial court denied Jones’s motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121750 - 2014-09-11
permission to search his person or the vehicle. In an oral decision, the trial court denied Jones’s motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121750 - 2014-09-11
Jay R. Sorensen v. Terri Lynn Schnorr-Sorensen
on the reasonable inferences from the evidence presented to the circuit court at the trial and that the later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13827 - 2005-03-31
on the reasonable inferences from the evidence presented to the circuit court at the trial and that the later
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13827 - 2005-03-31