Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28601 - 28610 of 62778 for child support.
Search results 28601 - 28610 of 62778 for child support.
[PDF]
State v. Argyle L. Hagen
to Arrest. ¶7 Every warrantless arrest must be supported by probable cause. See Molina v. State, 53
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16297 - 2017-09-21
to Arrest. ¶7 Every warrantless arrest must be supported by probable cause. See Molina v. State, 53
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16297 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
miles, and the totality of the circumstances do not support a reasonable suspicion that he was driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47834 - 2010-03-10
miles, and the totality of the circumstances do not support a reasonable suspicion that he was driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47834 - 2010-03-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, J.G., requested $11,082.09 in restitution. As relevant here, J.G. supported her request with a law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350508 - 2021-05-17
, J.G., requested $11,082.09 in restitution. As relevant here, J.G. supported her request with a law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350508 - 2021-05-17
COURT OF APPEALS
or treatment. ¶10 Melanie argues the evidence was insufficient to support an involuntary medication order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82799 - 2012-05-21
or treatment. ¶10 Melanie argues the evidence was insufficient to support an involuntary medication order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82799 - 2012-05-21
Malcolm H. v. Marc J. Ackerman
. There is no evidence in the record to support these contentions. The fact that Malcolm’s expert witnesses believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11441 - 2005-03-31
. There is no evidence in the record to support these contentions. The fact that Malcolm’s expert witnesses believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11441 - 2005-03-31
State v. Larry A. Clairmore
not support a stop under this basis. Alternatively, he argues that even if the stop was not made under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4010 - 2005-03-31
not support a stop under this basis. Alternatively, he argues that even if the stop was not made under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4010 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
the officer issued to Dubble.2 Dubble also contends that there is insufficient evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30881 - 2014-09-15
the officer issued to Dubble.2 Dubble also contends that there is insufficient evidence to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30881 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the termination petition. Amanda also argues the evidence did not support the jury’s verdict that the Marinette
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31511 - 2014-09-15
of the termination petition. Amanda also argues the evidence did not support the jury’s verdict that the Marinette
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31511 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. Burneske claims that the record does not support the trial court’s conclusion that Burneske breached her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30129 - 2007-08-29
. Burneske claims that the record does not support the trial court’s conclusion that Burneske breached her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30129 - 2007-08-29
State v. Alan David McCormack
Doe investigation, McCormack must present allegations supported by objective, factual assertions. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6052 - 2005-03-31
Doe investigation, McCormack must present allegations supported by objective, factual assertions. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6052 - 2005-03-31