Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28601 - 28610 of 42003 for jury duty/1000.
Search results 28601 - 28610 of 42003 for jury duty/1000.
[PDF]
SC Clerk-Ltr
comply with the provisions of SCR 22.26 concerning the duties of a person whose license to practice
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253886 - 2020-02-10
comply with the provisions of SCR 22.26 concerning the duties of a person whose license to practice
/sc/stats/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253886 - 2020-02-10
COURT OF APPEALS
203, ¶5. Because the circuit court’s duty to impose the surcharge was mandatory, rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75603 - 2011-12-27
203, ¶5. Because the circuit court’s duty to impose the surcharge was mandatory, rather than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75603 - 2011-12-27
COURT OF APPEALS
do see harm in transforming a common courtesy into an affirmative duty judicially superimposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88746 - 2012-10-30
do see harm in transforming a common courtesy into an affirmative duty judicially superimposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88746 - 2012-10-30
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
312, 742 N.W.2d 559 (stating that “we have no duty to scour the record to review arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054558 - 2025-12-23
312, 742 N.W.2d 559 (stating that “we have no duty to scour the record to review arguments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1054558 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James W. Bannen
that James W. Bannen comply with the provisions of SCR 22.26 concerning the duties of a person whose
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16565 - 2017-09-21
that James W. Bannen comply with the provisions of SCR 22.26 concerning the duties of a person whose
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16565 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert M. Hipke
, his duties on patrol were “[t]raffic enforcement, taking calls.” From Coey’s testimony, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7604 - 2005-03-31
, his duties on patrol were “[t]raffic enforcement, taking calls.” From Coey’s testimony, the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7604 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Mary Jane M. v. Milwaukee County
to discharge its duties as guardian of Mary Kate. The petition also alleges that Mary Kate stated she wants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3202 - 2017-09-19
to discharge its duties as guardian of Mary Kate. The petition also alleges that Mary Kate stated she wants
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3202 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
2024AP001713 - 01-24-2025 Order
that they should be bound down by strict rules and precedents, which serve to define and point out their duty
/sc/order/DisplayDocImage.pdf?docId=907148 - 2025-01-24
that they should be bound down by strict rules and precedents, which serve to define and point out their duty
/sc/order/DisplayDocImage.pdf?docId=907148 - 2025-01-24
CA Blank Order
. See Missouri v. Frye, 132 S.Ct. 1399, 1408 (2012) (“[A]s a general rule, defense counsel has the duty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97501 - 2013-05-27
. See Missouri v. Frye, 132 S.Ct. 1399, 1408 (2012) (“[A]s a general rule, defense counsel has the duty
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97501 - 2013-05-27
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Clay E. Konnor
concerning the duties of a person whose license to practice law in Wisconsin has been revoked. [1] SCR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17476 - 2005-03-31
concerning the duties of a person whose license to practice law in Wisconsin has been revoked. [1] SCR
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17476 - 2005-03-31