Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28601 - 28610 of 60097 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 28601 - 28610 of 60097 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
first addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court misused its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183299 - 2017-09-21
first addresses whether there would be arguable merit to a claim that the circuit court misused its
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=183299 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
charges were multiplicitous, which is a species of Double Jeopardy claim. The circuit court rejected
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131916 - 2017-09-21
charges were multiplicitous, which is a species of Double Jeopardy claim. The circuit court rejected
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131916 - 2017-09-21
State v. Richard A. M.
assault of the same child and from an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21520 - 2006-02-22
assault of the same child and from an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims he is entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21520 - 2006-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS
) appeal from a judgment entered in favor of Judy Martin following a bench trial in a small claims action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76523 - 2012-01-17
) appeal from a judgment entered in favor of Judy Martin following a bench trial in a small claims action
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76523 - 2012-01-17
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
(1)(a).[2] He also appeals from orders denying his postconviction motions. Huck claims that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15520 - 2005-03-31
(1)(a).[2] He also appeals from orders denying his postconviction motions. Huck claims that: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15520 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
agree with the report’s conclusion that there is no arguable merit to a claim that the court erroneously
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137101 - 2015-03-10
agree with the report’s conclusion that there is no arguable merit to a claim that the court erroneously
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137101 - 2015-03-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 28, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
involved in this case, and we have already resolved the substantive due process claim against Beecraft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27611 - 2006-12-27
involved in this case, and we have already resolved the substantive due process claim against Beecraft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27611 - 2006-12-27
County of Dane v. John S. McKenzie
] He claims the County did not establish that the blood test result admitted at trial was from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2497 - 2005-03-31
] He claims the County did not establish that the blood test result admitted at trial was from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2497 - 2005-03-31
County of Dane v. John S. McKenzie
] He claims the County did not establish that the blood test result admitted at trial was from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2498 - 2005-03-31
] He claims the County did not establish that the blood test result admitted at trial was from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2498 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
diagnoses; Jelks claimed that the difference or “new interpretation” was that one should rely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33700 - 2008-08-11
diagnoses; Jelks claimed that the difference or “new interpretation” was that one should rely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33700 - 2008-08-11