Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 28611 - 28620 of 39849 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 28611 - 28620 of 39849 for financial disclosure statement.
State v. Andrew B. Collette
statement that he did not want a resolution of the case, but instead a jury trial, at the June 30, 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3645 - 2005-03-31
statement that he did not want a resolution of the case, but instead a jury trial, at the June 30, 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3645 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, which he supported with his own testimony, was that the guns were not his and that the statements he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89147 - 2012-11-13
, which he supported with his own testimony, was that the guns were not his and that the statements he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89147 - 2012-11-13
[PDF]
WI App 40
by then-Chief Justice Abrahamson, highlighted a statement in the majority opinion regarding the authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259253 - 2020-07-09
by then-Chief Justice Abrahamson, highlighted a statement in the majority opinion regarding the authority
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=259253 - 2020-07-09
[PDF]
Donald W. Vodak v. Martin Kinyon
that all the factual statements in the amended complaint and exhibits are true and correct and also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11749 - 2017-09-20
that all the factual statements in the amended complaint and exhibits are true and correct and also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11749 - 2017-09-20
Arthur P. Gamroth v. Village of Jackson
a governmental subdivision unless a written notice containing the claimant’s address and an itemized statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11756 - 2005-03-31
a governmental subdivision unless a written notice containing the claimant’s address and an itemized statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11756 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
applicable in much different situations. For example, the “Statement of the Issues” in his opening brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010211 - 2025-09-18
applicable in much different situations. For example, the “Statement of the Issues” in his opening brief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010211 - 2025-09-18
COURT OF APPEALS
[of] that nature.” The judge denied making any statement that could be construed as a promise to impose any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39848 - 2009-08-24
[of] that nature.” The judge denied making any statement that could be construed as a promise to impose any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39848 - 2009-08-24
State v. Kendric J. Winters
the challenged confession on December 15, was unreasonably long, which would render the December 15 statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12301 - 2005-03-31
the challenged confession on December 15, was unreasonably long, which would render the December 15 statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12301 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that evening; (3) Resch’s statement that he was following his friends but had lost them; and (4) Resch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63016 - 2011-04-26
that evening; (3) Resch’s statement that he was following his friends but had lost them; and (4) Resch
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63016 - 2011-04-26
COURT OF APPEALS
.” (Capitalization and bolding omitted.) In support of this argument, Nelson seizes on the trial court’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82919 - 2012-05-29
.” (Capitalization and bolding omitted.) In support of this argument, Nelson seizes on the trial court’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82919 - 2012-05-29